Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 612 - UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.395 (2026)

Unemployment as result of labor dispute

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 612.395  Unemployment as result of labor dispute.

      1.  A person is disqualified for benefits for any week with respect to which the Administrator finds that the person’s total or partial unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the factory, establishment or other premises at which the person is or was last employed.

      2.  This section does not apply if it is shown to the satisfaction of the Administrator that:

      (a) The person is not participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor dispute which caused his or her unemployment; and

      (b) The person does not belong to a grade or class of workers of which, immediately before the commencement of the labor dispute, there were members employed at the premises at which the labor dispute occurs, any of whom are participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor dispute, but if in any case separate branches of work which are commonly conducted as separate businesses in separate premises are conducted in separate departments of the same premises, each such department shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to be a separate factory, establishment or other premises.

      [Part 5:129:1937; A 1939, 115; 1941, 412; 1943, 239; 1947, 413; 1949, 277; 1951, 339; 1955, 698]—(NRS A 1993, 1825)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1977–2018 · leading case: Alldredge v. Archie, 569 P.2d 940 (Nev. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alldredge v. Archie, 569 P.2d 940 (Nev. 1977). · cites it 15× “The denial of benefits was based upon the labor dispute disqualification set forth in NRS 612.395(1), which provides: “An individual shall be disqualified for benefits for any week with respect to which the executive director finds that his total or partial unemployment is due…”
Four Queens, Inc. v. Bd. of Review of Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't, 769 P.2d 49 (Nev. 1989). · cites it 7× “” NRS 612.395. 1 An applicant so disqualified must be denied unemployment benefits.”
Airport Casino, Inc. v. Jones, 741 P.2d 814 (Nev. 1987). · cites it 5× “OPINION Per Curiam: This is an unemployment compensation case involving the application of the “labor dispute” disqualification provision of NRS 612.395. The basic facts underlying the present controversy are essentially undisputed.”
Abate v. Ace Cab (Nev. 2018). · cites it 12× “ESD denied appellants' claims pursuant to NRS 612.395, which disqualifies an individual from receiving unemployment benefits if his or her unemployment is "due to a labor dispute in active progress.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.395(1) — 3 cases
Alldredge v. Archie, 569 P.2d 940 (Nev. 1977). “The denial of benefits was based upon the labor dispute disqualification set forth in NRS 612.395(1), which provides: “An individual shall be disqualified for benefits for any week with respect to which the executive director finds that his total or partial unemployment is due…”
Four Queens, Inc. v. Bd. of Review of Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't, 769 P.2d 49 (Nev. 1989). “” NRS 612.395. 1 An applicant so disqualified must be denied unemployment benefits.”
Abate v. Ace Cab (Nev. 2018). “ESD denied appellants' claims pursuant to NRS 612.395, which disqualifies an individual from receiving unemployment benefits if his or her unemployment is "due to a labor dispute in active progress.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.395(2) — 2 cases
Alldredge v. Archie, 569 P.2d 940 (Nev. 1977). “The denial of benefits was based upon the labor dispute disqualification set forth in NRS 612.395(1), which provides: “An individual shall be disqualified for benefits for any week with respect to which the executive director finds that his total or partial unemployment is due…”
Four Queens, Inc. v. Bd. of Review of Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't, 769 P.2d 49 (Nev. 1989). “” NRS 612.395. 1 An applicant so disqualified must be denied unemployment benefits.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.395(2)(a) — 1 case
Four Queens, Inc. v. Bd. of Review of Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't, 769 P.2d 49 (Nev. 1989). “” NRS 612.395. 1 An applicant so disqualified must be denied unemployment benefits.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.395(2)(b) — 2 cases
Alldredge v. Archie, 569 P.2d 940 (Nev. 1977). “The denial of benefits was based upon the labor dispute disqualification set forth in NRS 612.395(1), which provides: “An individual shall be disqualified for benefits for any week with respect to which the executive director finds that his total or partial unemployment is due…”
Four Queens, Inc. v. Bd. of Review of Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't, 769 P.2d 49 (Nev. 1989). “” NRS 612.395. 1 An applicant so disqualified must be denied unemployment benefits.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.