Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 616C - INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE: BENEFITS FOR INJURIES OR DEATH
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215 (2026)

Actions and proceedings to recover damages in tort or from proceeds of vehicle insurance: Reduction of compensation by amount of recovery; rights of injured employee or dependents and of insurer or Administrator; notification and payment of insurer or Administrator; instructions to jury; calculation of employer’s premium

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 616C.215  Actions and proceedings to recover damages in tort or from proceeds of vehicle insurance: Reduction of compensation by amount of recovery; rights of injured employee or dependents and of insurer or Administrator; notification and payment of insurer or Administrator; instructions to jury; calculation of employer’s premium.

      1.  If an injured employee or, in the event of his or her death, the dependents of the employee, bring an action in tort against his or her employer to recover payment for an injury which is compensable pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS and, notwithstanding the provisions of NRS 616A.020, receive payment from the employer for that injury:

      (a) The amount of compensation the injured employee or the dependents of the employee are entitled to receive pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS, including any future compensation, must be reduced by the amount paid by the employer.

      (b) The insurer, or in the case of claims involving the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account or a subsequent injury account the Administrator, has a lien upon the total amount paid by the employer if the injured employee or the dependents of the employee receive compensation pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS.

Ê This subsection is applicable whether the money paid to the employee or the dependents of the employee by the employer is classified as a gift, a settlement or otherwise. The provisions of this subsection do not grant to an injured employee any right of action in tort to recover damages from the employer for the injury.

      2.  When an employee receives an injury for which compensation is payable pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS and which was caused under circumstances creating a legal liability in some person, other than the employer or a person in the same employ, to pay damages in respect thereof:

      (a) The injured employee, or in case of death the dependents of the employee, may take proceedings against that person to recover damages, but the amount of the compensation the injured employee or the dependents of the employee are entitled to receive pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS, including any future compensation, must be reduced by the amount of the damages recovered, notwithstanding any act or omission of the employer or a person in the same employ which was a direct or proximate cause of the employee’s injury.

      (b) If the injured employee, or in case of death the dependents of the employee, receive compensation pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS, the insurer, or in case of claims involving the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account or a subsequent injury account the Administrator, has a right of action against the person so liable to pay damages and is subrogated to the rights of the injured employee or of the employee’s dependents to recover therefor.

      3.  When an injured employee incurs an injury for which compensation is payable pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS and which was caused under circumstances entitling the employee, or in the case of death the dependents of the employee, to receive proceeds under his or her employer’s policy of uninsured or underinsured vehicle coverage:

      (a) The injured employee, or in the case of death the dependents of the employee, may take proceedings to recover those proceeds, but the amount of compensation the injured employee or the dependents of the employee are entitled to receive pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS, including any future compensation, must be reduced by the amount of proceeds received.

      (b) If an injured employee, or in the case of death the dependents of the employee, receive compensation pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS, the insurer, or in the case of claims involving the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account or a subsequent injury account the Administrator, is subrogated to the rights of the injured employee or the dependents of the employee to recover proceeds under the employer’s policy of uninsured or underinsured vehicle coverage. The insurer and the Administrator are not subrogated to the rights of an injured employee or the dependents of the employee under a policy of uninsured or underinsured vehicle coverage purchased by the employee.

      (c) Any provision in the employer’s policy of uninsured or underinsured vehicle coverage which has the effect of:

             (1) Limiting the rights of the injured employee or the dependents of the employee to recover proceeds under the policy because of the receipt of any compensation pursuant to the provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS;

             (2) Limiting the rights of subrogation of the insurer or Administrator provided by paragraph (b); or

             (3) Excluding coverage which inures to the direct or indirect benefit of the insurer or Administrator,

Ê is void.

      4.  In any action or proceedings taken by the insurer or the Administrator pursuant to this section, evidence of the amount of compensation, accident benefits and other expenditures which the insurer, the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account or a subsequent injury account have paid or become obligated to pay by reason of the injury or death of the employee is admissible. If in such action or proceedings the insurer or the Administrator recovers more than those amounts, the excess must be paid to the injured employee or the dependents of the employee.

      5.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, in any case where the insurer or the Administrator is subrogated to the rights of the injured employee or of the employee’s dependents as provided in subsection 2 or 3, the insurer or the Administrator has a lien upon the total proceeds of any recovery from some person other than the employer, whether the proceeds of such recovery are by way of judgment, settlement or otherwise. The injured employee, or in the case of his or her death the dependents of the employee, are not entitled to double recovery for the same injury, notwithstanding any act or omission of the employer or a person in the same employ which was a direct or proximate cause of the employee’s injury.

      6.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, the lien provided for pursuant to subsection 1 or 5 includes the total compensation expenditure incurred by the insurer, the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account or a subsequent injury account for the injured employee and the dependents of the employee.

      7.  For a lien provided for pursuant to subsection 5:

      (a) The maximum amount which the insurer or Administrator may recover must be the lesser of:

             (1) The amount of the lien, as reduced pursuant to paragraph (b); or

             (2) One-third of the total amount recovered from the person other than the employer or person in the same employ, as reduced pursuant to paragraph (b). As used in this subparagraph, “total amount recovered” means the total proceeds described in subsection 5, including, without limitation, any attorney’s fees or costs and the monetary value of any virtual currency, securities, real property, personal property or intellectual property which is part of the judgment, settlement or other means of recovery, as applicable, as calculated on the date on which the judgment, settlement or other document providing for the other means of recovery, as applicable, is executed.

      (b) The maximum amount which the insurer or Administrator may recover pursuant to paragraph (a) must be reduced by an amount equal to one-half of the reasonable costs incurred by the injured employee, or in the case of death the dependents of the employee, in prosecuting or settling the claim against a person other than the employer or person in the same employ. An itemized memorandum of any such reasonable costs:

             (1) Must be verified by the injured employee, the dependents of the employee or the attorney or representative of the injured employee or the dependents of the employee and provided to the insurer or Administrator.

             (2) Is subject to judicial review in a court of competent jurisdiction, if a petition is filed within 30 days after the date on which the insurer or Administrator receives a verified itemized memorandum provided pursuant to subparagraph (1).

      (c) If the insurer or Administrator imposes an offset to the amount of future compensation that the injured employee, or in the case of death the dependents of the employee, is entitled to receive:

             (1) Such an offset may be applied only against payments of compensation that are not accident benefits; and

             (2) Each individual payment to which the offset applied must be reduced by not more than one-third of the amount otherwise owed until the total amount of all such reductions equals the net amount recovered by the injured employee, or in the case of death the dependents of the employee, from the person other than the employer or person in the same employ. As used in this subparagraph, “net amount recovered” means an amount equal to the monetary value of the total amount recovered, as defined in subparagraph (2) of paragraph (a), minus:

                   (I) The maximum amount which the insurer or Administrator may recover pursuant to paragraph (a); and

                   (II) The amount of any attorney’s fees.

      8.  An injured employee, or in the case of death the dependents of the employee, or the attorney or representative of the injured employee or the dependents of the employee, shall notify the insurer, or in the case of claims involving the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account or a subsequent injury account the Administrator, in writing before initiating a proceeding or action pursuant to this section.

      9.  Within 15 days after the date of recovery by way of actual receipt of the proceeds of the judgment, settlement or otherwise:

      (a) The injured employee or the dependents of the employee, or the attorney or representative of the injured employee or the dependents of the employee; and

      (b) The third-party insurer,

Ê shall notify the insurer, or in the case of claims involving the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account or a subsequent injury account the Administrator, of the recovery and pay to the insurer or the Administrator, respectively, the amount due pursuant to this section together with an itemized statement showing the distribution of the total recovery. The attorney or representative of the injured employee or the dependents of the employee and the third-party insurer are jointly and severally liable for any amount to which an insurer is entitled pursuant to this section if the attorney, representative or third-party insurer has knowledge of the lien provided for in this section.

      10.  An insurer shall not sell its lien to a third-party insurer unless the injured employee or the dependents of the employee, or the attorney or representative of the injured employee or the dependents of the employee, refuses to provide to the insurer information concerning the action against the third party.

      11.  In any trial of an action by the injured employee, or in the case of his or her death by the dependents of the employee, against a person other than the employer or a person in the same employ, the jury must receive proof of the amount of all payments made or to be made by the insurer or the Administrator. The court shall instruct the jury substantially as follows:

 

       Payment of workmen’s compensation benefits by the insurer, or in the case of claims involving the Uninsured Employers’ Claim Account or a subsequent injury account the Administrator, is based upon the fact that a compensable industrial accident occurred, and does not depend upon blame or fault. If the plaintiff does not obtain a judgment in his or her favor in this case, the plaintiff is not required to repay his or her employer, the insurer or the Administrator any amount paid to the plaintiff or paid on the behalf of the plaintiff by the plaintiff’s employer, the insurer or the Administrator.

       If you decide that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the defendant, you shall find damages for the plaintiff in accordance with the court’s instructions on damages and return your verdict in the plaintiff’s favor in the amount so found without deducting the amount of any compensation benefits paid to or for the plaintiff. The law provides a means by which any compensation benefits will be repaid from your award.

 

      12.  To calculate an employer’s premium, the employer’s account with the private carrier must be credited with an amount equal to that recovered by the private carrier from a third party pursuant to this section, less the private carrier’s share of the expenses of litigation incurred in obtaining the recovery, except that the total credit must not exceed the amount of compensation actually paid or reserved by the private carrier on the injured employee’s claim.

      13.  As used in this section, “third-party insurer” means an insurer that issued to a third party who is liable for damages pursuant to subsection 2, a policy of liability insurance the proceeds of which are recoverable pursuant to this section. The term includes an insurer that issued to an employer a policy of uninsured or underinsured vehicle coverage.

      [75:168:1947; A 1949, 659; 1943 NCL § 2680.75]—(NRS A 1957, 519; 1973, 498; 1977, 216, 424; 1979, 1055; 1981, 1491; 1991, 2419; 1993, 621, 742; 1997, 599; 1999, 221, 763, 1779; 2001, 2765; 2007, 3346; 2025, 1176)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nevada, 146 P.3d 258 (Nev. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nevada, 146 P.3d 258 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 24× “Paul seeking a judicial declaration that the exclusionary clauses were unenforceable in light of the 1993 amendments to NRS 616C.215, which permits workers’ compensation insurers to sub-rogate against UM/UIM policies issued to employers of persons injured in work-related…”
Employers Ins. Co. of Nevada v. Chandler, 23 P.3d 255 (Nev. 2001). · cites it 15× “On appeal, EICON contends that Chandler is not entitled to receive further workers’ compensation benefits, including medical benefits, without first exhausting the entire amount of his third-party settlement proceeds because the term “compensation” in NRS 616C.215 includes…”
Tri-Cnty. Equip. & Leasing, LLC v. Klinke, 286 P.3d 593 (Nev. 2012). · cites it 16× “Klinke sought, in relevant part, to exclude evidence of the workers’ compensation payments and write-downs *354 under the collateral source rule, which bars evidence of payments for injuries made by an independent third party, and she argued that NRS 616C.215, the Nevada statute…”
Silvera v. Employers Ins., 40 P.3d 429 (Nev. 2002). · cites it 19× “EICON subsequently asserted that it had a right under NRS 616C.215 to place a lien against the MIC settlement proceeds.”
Cramer v. Peavy, 3 P.3d 665 (Nev. 2000). · cites it 16× “On appeal, Cramer contends that: (1) the district court erred in denying his motions for mistrial made when the jury was told he had received compensation from the State Industrial Insurance System (“SIIS”); (2) NRS 616C.215(10) violates the separation of powers doctrine; and…”
Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. Cnty. of Clark, 147 P.3d 1120 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 10× “The majority noted that NRS 616C.215 (formerly NRS 616.560) provides that when a workers’ compensation insurer pays benefits to an injured worker, it becomes subrogated to the injured workers’ right to recover damages from a third-party tortfeasor.”
Amtrust N. Am., Inc. v. Vasquez, Jr., 555 P.3d 1164 (Nev. 2024). · cites it 17× “The hearing officer, an appeals officer, and the district court all concluded that, pursuant to NRS 616C.215, then codified as NRS 616.560,3 Caesars was entitled to assert a lien against the settlement proceeds.”
Harris v. Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc., 25 P.3d 206 (Nev. 2001). · cites it 2× “020(1), which states in part: The rights and remedies provided [by the NIIA] for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment shall be exclusive, except as otherwise provided [in the NIIA], of all other rights and…”
ACS Recovery Servs., Inc. v. Larry Griffi, 723 F.3d 518 (5th Cir. 2013). “§ 71-3-71; Nev.Rev. Stat. § 616C.215; N.H.Rev.Stat. Ann.”
Harper v. Copperpoint Mut. Ins. Holding Co., 2022 NV 33 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 2× “Compare NRS 616C.215(5), with Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann.”
Star Ins. Co. v. Neighbors, 138 P.3d 507 (Nev. 2006). “out of and in the course of his employment: (1) In this State; or (2) While on temporary assignment outside the State for a period of not more than 12 months; (c) He files a claim for compensation with the Division; and (d) He makes an irrevocable assignment to the [Division of…”
Lipps v. S. Nevada Paving, 998 P.2d 1183 (Nev. 2000). · cites it 3× “560(1) (recodified as NRS 616C.215(2)(a)). 3 NRS 616A.210(1) states in part that all “subcontractors, independent contractors and the employees of either shall be deemed to be employees of the principal contractor for the purposes of [the NBA].”
Show all 31 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(10) — 8 cases
Cramer v. Peavy, 3 P.3d 665 (Nev. 2000). “On appeal, Cramer contends that: (1) the district court erred in denying his motions for mistrial made when the jury was told he had received compensation from the State Industrial Insurance System (“SIIS”); (2) NRS 616C.215(10) violates the separation of powers doctrine; and…”
Tri-Cnty. Equip. & Leasing, LLC v. Klinke, 286 P.3d 593 (Nev. 2012). “Klinke sought, in relevant part, to exclude evidence of the workers’ compensation payments and write-downs *354 under the collateral source rule, which bars evidence of payments for injuries made by an independent third party, and she argued that NRS 616C.215, the Nevada statute…”
Rathburn v. Knight Transp., Inc. (D. Nev. 2019).
Hayes v. Watson, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 55 (Nev. 2024).
Hayes v. Watson, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 55 (Nev. 2024).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(2) — 8 cases
Silvera v. Employers Ins., 40 P.3d 429 (Nev. 2002). “EICON subsequently asserted that it had a right under NRS 616C.215 to place a lien against the MIC settlement proceeds.”
Poremba Vs. So. Nevada Paving, 2017 NV 2 (Nev. 2017).
Poremba Vs. So. Nevada Paving, 2016 NV 24 (Nev. 2016).
Poremba Vs. So. Nevada Paving, 2017 NV 2 (Nev. 2017).
Tekle v. Tecosky-Feldman (Nev. 2019).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(2)(a) — 11 cases
Employers Ins. Co. of Nevada v. Chandler, 23 P.3d 255 (Nev. 2001). “On appeal, EICON contends that Chandler is not entitled to receive further workers’ compensation benefits, including medical benefits, without first exhausting the entire amount of his third-party settlement proceeds because the term “compensation” in NRS 616C.215 includes…”
Harris v. Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc., 25 P.3d 206 (Nev. 2001). “020(1), which states in part: The rights and remedies provided [by the NIIA] for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment shall be exclusive, except as otherwise provided [in the NIIA], of all other rights and…”
Lipps v. S. Nevada Paving, 998 P.2d 1183 (Nev. 2000). “560(1) (recodified as NRS 616C.215(2)(a)). 3 NRS 616A.210(1) states in part that all “subcontractors, independent contractors and the employees of either shall be deemed to be employees of the principal contractor for the purposes of [the NBA].”
Tucker v. Action Equip. & Scaffold Co., 951 P.2d 1027 (Nev. 1997).
Poremba Vs. So. Nevada Paving, 2016 NV 24 (Nev. 2016).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(2)(b) — 4 cases
Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. Cnty. of Clark, 147 P.3d 1120 (Nev. 2006). “The majority noted that NRS 616C.215 (formerly NRS 616.560) provides that when a workers’ compensation insurer pays benefits to an injured worker, it becomes subrogated to the injured workers’ right to recover damages from a third-party tortfeasor.”
Silvera v. Employers Ins., 40 P.3d 429 (Nev. 2002). “EICON subsequently asserted that it had a right under NRS 616C.215 to place a lien against the MIC settlement proceeds.”
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nevada, 146 P.3d 258 (Nev. 2006). “Paul seeking a judicial declaration that the exclusionary clauses were unenforceable in light of the 1993 amendments to NRS 616C.215, which permits workers’ compensation insurers to sub-rogate against UM/UIM policies issued to employers of persons injured in work-related…”
Nicolaus v. West Side Transp., Inc., 185 F.R.D. 608 (D. Nev. 1999).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(3) — 2 cases
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nevada, 146 P.3d 258 (Nev. 2006). “Paul seeking a judicial declaration that the exclusionary clauses were unenforceable in light of the 1993 amendments to NRS 616C.215, which permits workers’ compensation insurers to sub-rogate against UM/UIM policies issued to employers of persons injured in work-related…”
Iovino v. AmTrust Fin. Servs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2025).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(3)(b) — 3 cases
Silvera v. Employers Ins., 40 P.3d 429 (Nev. 2002). “EICON subsequently asserted that it had a right under NRS 616C.215 to place a lien against the MIC settlement proceeds.”
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nevada, 146 P.3d 258 (Nev. 2006). “Paul seeking a judicial declaration that the exclusionary clauses were unenforceable in light of the 1993 amendments to NRS 616C.215, which permits workers’ compensation insurers to sub-rogate against UM/UIM policies issued to employers of persons injured in work-related…”
Iovino v. AmTrust Fin. Servs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2025).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(3)(c) — 1 case
Iovino v. AmTrust Fin. Servs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2025).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(3)(c)(1) — 1 case
Iovino v. AmTrust Fin. Servs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2025).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(5) — 5 cases
Amtrust N. Am., Inc. v. Vasquez, Jr., 555 P.3d 1164 (Nev. 2024). “The hearing officer, an appeals officer, and the district court all concluded that, pursuant to NRS 616C.215, then codified as NRS 616.560,3 Caesars was entitled to assert a lien against the settlement proceeds.”
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nevada, 146 P.3d 258 (Nev. 2006). “Paul seeking a judicial declaration that the exclusionary clauses were unenforceable in light of the 1993 amendments to NRS 616C.215, which permits workers’ compensation insurers to sub-rogate against UM/UIM policies issued to employers of persons injured in work-related…”
Silvera v. Employers Ins., 40 P.3d 429 (Nev. 2002). “EICON subsequently asserted that it had a right under NRS 616C.215 to place a lien against the MIC settlement proceeds.”
Harper v. Copperpoint Mut. Ins. Holding Co., 2022 NV 33 (Nev. 2022). “Compare NRS 616C.215(5), with Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann.”
Iovino v. AmTrust Fin. Servs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2025).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(7) — 1 case
Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. Cnty. of Clark, 147 P.3d 1120 (Nev. 2006). “The majority noted that NRS 616C.215 (formerly NRS 616.560) provides that when a workers’ compensation insurer pays benefits to an injured worker, it becomes subrogated to the injured workers’ right to recover damages from a third-party tortfeasor.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(8) — 1 case
Iovino v. AmTrust Fin. Servs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2025).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(c) — 1 case
Iovino v. AmTrust Fin. Servs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.