NRS
62H.030 Maintenance and inspection of records.
1. The juvenile court shall make and keep
records of all cases brought before the juvenile court.
2. Except as otherwise provided in this
section and NRS 217.110, records of any
case brought before the juvenile court may be opened to inspection only by
court order to persons who have a legitimate interest in the records.
3. The following records and information
may be opened to inspection without a court order:
(a) Records of traffic violations which are being
forwarded to the Department of Motor Vehicles;
(b) Records which have not been sealed and which
are required by the Division of Parole and Probation for preparation of
presentence investigations and reports pursuant to NRS 176.135 or general investigations and
reports pursuant to NRS 176.151;
(c) Records which have not been sealed and which
are to be used, pursuant to chapter 179D of
NRS, by:
(1) The Central Repository;
(2) The Division of Parole and Probation;
or
(3) A person who is conducting an
assessment of the risk of recidivism of an adult or juvenile sex offender;
(d) Regardless of whether or not they have been
sealed, records which are to be used for the purpose of conducting a background
check to determine whether a person who is less than 21 years of age is
eligible to purchase and possess firearms under state and federal law;
(e) Information maintained in the standardized
system established pursuant to NRS 62H.200;
and
(f) Information that must be collected by the
Division of Child and Family Services pursuant to NRS 62H.220.
4. The clerk of the court shall prepare
and cause to be printed forms for social and legal records and other papers as
may be required.
(Added to NRS by 2003,
1090; A 2005,
62; 2023,
2438)
Notes of Decisions
State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.) (Nev. 2013).
· cites it 4× “, NRS 62H.030(2) (records of juvenile offenders can generally be opened to the public only through court order to those persons with a legitimate interest in the records); NRS 62H.”
Cota v. Malone (D. Nev. 2022).
· cites it 2× “) 26 In his Objection, Cota makes the following three arguments: (1) Judge Baldwin 27 incorrectly names Defendants in the R&R; (2) Defendants Gregory and Johnson abused 28 their authority; and (3) Defendant Johnson violated NRS § 62H.030(2) when he illegally 1 || held onto…”
Clay (Bryan) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Nev. 2015).
· cites it 2× “To facilitate the prosecution of those offenses, the State filed a broad motion in the juvenile court pursuant to NRS 62H.030 and MRS 6211.170 seeking to unseal and release Clay's juvenile records.”
In re I.S., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18 (Nev. 2024).
“140 (addressing the sealing of juvenile records, which generally occurs when the juvenile reaches age 18), a juvenile delinquency adjudication no longer carries a presumption of collateral consequences. See NRS 62H.030(3)(b) ("The following records and information may be opened…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62H.030(2) — 4 cases
State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.) (Nev. 2013).
“, NRS 62H.030(2) (records of juvenile offenders can generally be opened to the public only through court order to those persons with a legitimate interest in the records); NRS 62H.”
Cota v. Malone (D. Nev. 2022).
“) 26 In his Objection, Cota makes the following three arguments: (1) Judge Baldwin 27 incorrectly names Defendants in the R&R; (2) Defendants Gregory and Johnson abused 28 their authority; and (3) Defendant Johnson violated NRS § 62H.030(2) when he illegally 1 || held onto…”
Clay (Bryan) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Nev. 2015).
“To facilitate the prosecution of those offenses, the State filed a broad motion in the juvenile court pursuant to NRS 62H.030 and MRS 6211.170 seeking to unseal and release Clay's juvenile records.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62H.030(3)(b) — 3 cases
In re I.S., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18 (Nev. 2024).
“140 (addressing the sealing of juvenile records, which generally occurs when the juvenile reaches age 18), a juvenile delinquency adjudication no longer carries a presumption of collateral consequences. See NRS 62H.030(3)(b) ("The following records and information may be opened…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.