Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 639 - PHARMACISTS AND PHARMACY

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.233

License required

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 639.233  License required.

      1.  Any person, including a wholesaler or manufacturer, who engages in the business of wholesale distribution or furnishing controlled substances, poisons, drugs, devices or appliances that are restricted by federal law to sale by or on the order of a physician to any person located within this State shall obtain a license pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.

      2.  For the purpose of this section, a person is “engaged in the business of furnishing” if the person:

      (a) Solicits or accepts orders for drugs or devices whose sale in this State is restricted by this chapter or chapter 453 or 454 of NRS; or

      (b) Receives, stores or ships such drugs or devices.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1657; A 1971, 2041; 1973, 780; 1979, 1693; 1991, 1160; 1993, 1222; 2003, 2288)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev · cites it 5× “Dutchess and Legend argue that the Board erred for two reasons: (1) the statute governing licensing requirements, NRS 639.233, did not require a company such as Overseas to maintain a license at the time its transactions with Dutchess took place; and (2) even if Overseas was…”
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm. (2008) nev · cites it 5× “Dutchess and Legend argue that the Board erred for two reasons: (1) the statute governing licensing requirements, NRS 639.233, did not require a company such as Overseas to maintain a license at the time its transactions with Dutchess took place; and (2) even if Overseas was…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.233(1) — 2 cases
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev “Dutchess and Legend argue that the Board erred for two reasons: (1) the statute governing licensing requirements, NRS 639.233, did not require a company such as Overseas to maintain a license at the time its transactions with Dutchess took place; and (2) even if Overseas was…”
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm. (2008) nev “Dutchess and Legend argue that the Board erred for two reasons: (1) the statute governing licensing requirements, NRS 639.233, did not require a company such as Overseas to maintain a license at the time its transactions with Dutchess took place; and (2) even if Overseas was…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.233(2) — 2 cases
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev “Dutchess and Legend argue that the Board erred for two reasons: (1) the statute governing licensing requirements, NRS 639.233, did not require a company such as Overseas to maintain a license at the time its transactions with Dutchess took place; and (2) even if Overseas was…”
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm. (2008) nev “Dutchess and Legend argue that the Board erred for two reasons: (1) the statute governing licensing requirements, NRS 639.233, did not require a company such as Overseas to maintain a license at the time its transactions with Dutchess took place; and (2) even if Overseas was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.