Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 639 - PHARMACISTS AND PHARMACY

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.255

Authorized disciplinary action; judicial review of such action; fines; private reprimands prohibited; orders imposing discipline deemed public records

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 639.255  Authorized disciplinary action; judicial review of such action; fines; private reprimands prohibited; orders imposing discipline deemed public records.

      1.  The holder of any certificate, license or permit issued by the Board, whose default has been entered or who has been heard by the Board and found guilty of the violations alleged in the accusation, may be disciplined by the Board by one or more of the following methods:

      (a) Suspending judgment;

      (b) Placing the certificate, license or permit holder on probation;

      (c) Suspending the right of a certificate holder to practice, or the right to use any license or permit, for a period to be determined by the Board;

      (d) Revoking the certificate, license or permit;

      (e) Public reprimand; or

      (f) Imposition of a fine for each count of the accusation, in accordance with the schedule of fines established pursuant to subsection 3.

      2.  Such action by the Board is final, except that the propriety of such action is subject to review upon questions of law by a court of competent jurisdiction.

      3.  The Board shall, by regulation, establish a schedule of fines that may be imposed pursuant to paragraph (f) of subsection 1. Each fine must be commensurate with the severity of the applicable violation, but must not exceed $10,000 for each violation.

      4.  The Board shall not issue a private reprimand.

      5.  An order that imposes discipline and the findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting that order are public records.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1661; A 1973, 782; 1979, 1694; 1993, 888; 2001, 836, 1634; 2003, 3455)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1972–2008 · leading case: Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev · cites it 7× “NRS 639.255 allows the Board to impose fines as a method of discipline.”
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm. (2008) nev · cites it 7× “NRS 639.255 allows the Board to impose fines as a method of discipline.”
Nevada State Board of Pharmacy v. Garrigus (1972) nev “NRS 639.255(2) provides that the action of the Board of Pharmacy shall be final except that the propriety of its disciplinary action is subject to review upon questions of law by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.255(1)(f) — 1 case
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm. (2008) nev “NRS 639.255 allows the Board to impose fines as a method of discipline.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.255(1)(g) — 1 case
Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm. (2008) nev “NRS 639.255 allows the Board to impose fines as a method of discipline.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.255(2) — 1 case
Nevada State Board of Pharmacy v. Garrigus (1972) nev “NRS 639.255(2) provides that the action of the Board of Pharmacy shall be final except that the propriety of its disciplinary action is subject to review upon questions of law by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.255(l)(f) — 1 case
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev “NRS 639.255 allows the Board to impose fines as a method of discipline.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 639.255(l)(g) — 1 case
Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (2008) nev “NRS 639.255 allows the Board to impose fines as a method of discipline.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.