NRS
92A.410 Notification of stockholders regarding right of dissent.
1. If a proposed corporate action creating
dissenter’s rights is submitted for approval pursuant to a vote at a
stockholders’ meeting, the notice of the meeting must state that stockholders
are, are not or may be entitled to assert dissenter’s rights under NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive. If the domestic
corporation concludes that dissenter’s rights are or may be available, a copy
of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, must accompany the
meeting notice sent to those stockholders of record entitled to exercise
dissenter’s rights.
2. If a corporate action creating
dissenter’s rights is submitted for approval pursuant to a written consent of
the stockholders or taken without a vote of the stockholders, the domestic
corporation:
(a) May send an advance notice statement with
respect to the proposed corporate action; and
(b) If the proposed corporate action is taken,
the domestic corporation shall notify in writing all stockholders of record
entitled to assert dissenter’s rights that the action was taken and send them
the dissenter’s notice described in NRS
92A.430.
(Added to NRS by 1995,
2089; A 1997,
730; 2009,
1723; 2013,
1286; 2019,
111; 2021,
1522)
Notes of Decisions
Smith v. Kisorin USA, Inc., 254 P.3d 636 (Nev. 2011).
· cites it 7× “380; NRS 92A.410; American Ethanol v. Cordillera Fund, 127 Nev.”
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021).
· cites it 4× “As relevant here, NRS 92A.410, .420, .430, 3 and .440 generally set forth a four-step process by which a stockholder who objects to a proposed merger may seek the fair value of the stockholder's shares from the corporation if the stockholder believes the proposed price for those…”
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021).
· cites it 2× “As relevant here, NRS 92A.410, .420, .430, 3 and .440 generally set forth a four-step process by which a stockholder who objects to a proposed merger may seek the fair value of the stockholder's shares from the corporation if the stockholder believes the proposed price for those…”
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. v. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021).
· cites it 2× “As relevant here, NRS 92A.410, .420, .430, 3 and .440 generally set forth a four-step process by which a stockholder who objects to a proposed merger may seek the fair value of the stockholder's shares from the corporation if the stockholder believes the proposed price for those…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 92A.410(1) — 4 cases
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021).
“As relevant here, NRS 92A.410, .420, .430, 3 and .440 generally set forth a four-step process by which a stockholder who objects to a proposed merger may seek the fair value of the stockholder's shares from the corporation if the stockholder believes the proposed price for those…”
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021).
“As relevant here, NRS 92A.410, .420, .430, 3 and .440 generally set forth a four-step process by which a stockholder who objects to a proposed merger may seek the fair value of the stockholder's shares from the corporation if the stockholder believes the proposed price for those…”
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. v. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021).
“As relevant here, NRS 92A.410, .420, .430, 3 and .440 generally set forth a four-step process by which a stockholder who objects to a proposed merger may seek the fair value of the stockholder's shares from the corporation if the stockholder believes the proposed price for those…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 92A.410(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.