Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 92A.430 (2026)

Dissenter’s notice: Delivery to stockholders entitled to assert rights; contents

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 92A.430  Dissenter’s notice: Delivery to stockholders entitled to assert rights; contents.

      1.  The subject corporation shall deliver a written dissenter’s notice to all stockholders of record entitled to assert dissenter’s rights in whole or in part, and any beneficial stockholder who has previously asserted dissenter’s rights pursuant to NRS 92A.400.

      2.  The dissenter’s notice must be sent no later than 10 days after the effective date of the corporate action specified in NRS 92A.380, and must:

      (a) State where the demand for payment must be sent and where and when certificates, if any, for shares must be deposited;

      (b) Inform the holders of shares not represented by certificates to what extent the transfer of the shares will be restricted after the demand for payment is received;

      (c) Supply a form for demanding payment that includes the date of the first announcement to the news media or to the stockholders of the terms of the proposed action and requires that the person asserting dissenter’s rights certify whether or not the person acquired beneficial ownership of the shares before that date;

      (d) Set a date by which the subject corporation must receive the demand for payment, which may not be less than 30 nor more than 60 days after the date the notice is delivered and state that the stockholder shall be deemed to have waived the right to demand payment with respect to the shares unless the form is received by the subject corporation by such specified date; and

      (e) Be accompanied by a copy of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive.

      (Added to NRS by 1995, 2089; A 2005, 2205; 2009, 1724; 2013, 1286)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2011–2021 · leading case: Smith v. Kisorin USA, Inc., 254 P.3d 636 (Nev. 2011).
Smith v. Kisorin USA, Inc., 254 P.3d 636 (Nev. 2011). · cites it 6× “The Smiths argue that pursuant to NRS 92A.430, Kisorin was required to deliver a notice to all stockholders entitled to assert dissenters’ rights, irrespective of whether the stockholders were stockholders in street name or beneficial stockholders, and that it failed to do so.”
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021). · cites it 6× “" At step three, and within ten days after the vote is taken and the merger has been approved, NRS 92A.430 requires the corporation to notify stockholders of record and "any beneficial stockholder who has previously asserted dissenter's righte that the stockholder must demand…”
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021). · cites it 3× “" At step three, and within ten days after the vote is taken and the merger has been approved, NRS 92A.430 requires the corporation to notify stockholders of record and "any beneficial stockholder who has previously asserted dissenter's righte that the stockholder must demand…”
Aerogrow Int'l, Inc. v. Dist. Ct. (radoff), 2021 NV 76 (Nev. 2021). · cites it 3× “" At step three, and within ten days after the vote is taken and the merger has been approved, NRS 92A.430 requires the corporation to notify stockholders of record and "any beneficial stockholder who has previously asserted dissenter's righte that the stockholder must demand…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.