The nomination or election of any person to any public office or party position, or the approval or disapproval of any public proposition, may be contested by the voters of this State or of any of its political subdivisions affected thereby upon 1 or more of the following grounds:
a. Malconduct, fraud or corruption on the part of the members of any district board, or of any members of the board of county canvassers, sufficient to challenge the result;
b. When the incumbent was not eligible to the office at the time of the election;
c. When the incumbent had been duly convicted before such election of any crime which would render him incompetent to exercise the right of suffrage, and the incumbent had not been pardoned at the time of the election;
d. When the incumbent had given or offered to any elector or any member of any district board, clerk or canvasser, any bribe or reward, in money, property or thing of value for the purpose of procuring his election;
e. When illegal votes have been received, or legal votes rejected at the polls sufficient to change the result;
f. For any error by any board of canvassers in counting the votes or declaring the result of the election, if such error would change the result;
g. For any other cause which shows that another was the person legally elected;
h. The paying, promise to pay or expenditure of any money or other thing of value or incurring of any liability in excess of the amount permitted by this title for any purpose or in any manner not authorized by this title;
i. When a petition for nomination is not filed in good faith or the affidavit annexed thereto is false or defective.
The term "incumbent" means the person whom the canvassers declare elected or the person who is declared elected as a result of a recount; but in the case of a tie vote as a result of the canvass or recount, either party may contest the election, in which case the term "incumbent" means the person having an equal number of votes with the contestant.
Amended by L.1956, c. 128, p. 532, s. 1.
Notes of Decisions
In Re Gray-Sadler, 753 A.2d 1101 (N.J. 2000).
“For any error by any board of canvassers in counting the votes or declaring the result of the election, if such error would change the result; [or] g.”
In Re Petition of Byron, 398 A.2d 599 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1978).
“DAVID SPERLING TO THE OFFICE OF MAYOR, AND SAMUEL MARSHALL AND HELEN FARAGO TO THE OFFICES OF COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF WRIGHTSTOWN PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 19:29-1 ET SEQ. AND IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF EDWARD G.”
In Re Petition of Hartnett, 394 A.2d 871 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1978).
“STANLEY BARLOW TO THE OFFICE OF COUNCILMAN OF THE BOROUGH OF LEONIA PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 19:29-1 ET SEQ. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.”
Application of James T. Murphy, 243 A.2d 832 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968).
“MILLER TO THE OFFICE OF MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 19:29-1, ET SEQ. WILLIAM K. METTLER, INCUMBENT-APPELLANT, v.”
Robertson v. Bartels, 890 F. Supp. 2d 519 (D.N.J. 2012).
“Moriarty (Democrat) 21,086 Gabriela Mosquera (Democrat) 18,907 Shelley Lovett (Republican) 14,351 Patricia Fratticioli (Republican) 14,000 Tony Celeste (Independent) 1,767 On December 1, 2011, Lovett filed an Election Challenge Petition, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 19:29-1 to -14,…”
Hoch v. Phelan, 796 F. Supp. 130 (D.N.J. 1992).
“Plaintiffs challenge the facial validity of the so-called “Election Contest Subpoena Laws,” which are comprised of Chapter 29 of the New Jersey Statutes governing “Contest of Nominations or Elections,” N.J.S.A. 19:29-1 et seq., Rule 1:9 of the Rules Governing the Courts of the…”
Michael Hopson v. Anthony Cirz (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025).
· cites it 3× “On March 7, 2025, Hopson filed his verified petition and complaint in the Law Division against defendants seeking a declaratory judgment that Cirz was not the winner of the election (count one); contesting the election results under N.J.S.A. 19:29-1 due to malconduct, fraud, and…”
Wilmoth v. Guadagno (D.N.J. 2021).
· cites it 2× “” N.J. Stat. Ann. § 19:29-1 . It is a third-degree crime to commit fraud regarding the certificate of nomination or petition.”
Wilmoth v. Guadagno (D.N.J. 2021).
· cites it 2× “” N.J. Stat. Ann. § 19:29-1 . It is a third-degree crime to commit fraud regarding the certificate of nomination or petition.”
— N.J. Stat. § 19:29-1(a) — 2 cases
Michael Hopson v. Anthony Cirz (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025).
“On March 7, 2025, Hopson filed his verified petition and complaint in the Law Division against defendants seeking a declaratory judgment that Cirz was not the winner of the election (count one); contesting the election results under N.J.S.A. 19:29-1 due to malconduct, fraud, and…”
— N.J. Stat. § 19:29-1(b) — 1 case
— N.J. Stat. § 19:29-1(e) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.