New Jersey Statutes

N.J. Stat. § 32:1-7 (2026)

General powers of port authority; state and municipal property and bonded indebtedness protected

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaN.J. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ARTICLE VI.

The port authority shall constitute a body, both corporate and politic, with full power and authority to purchase, construct, lease and/or operate any terminal or transportation facility within said district; and to make charges for the use thereof; and for any of such purposes to own, hold, lease and/or operate real or personal property, to borrow money and secure the same by bonds or by mortgages upon any property held or to be held by it. No property now or hereafter vested in or held by either state, or by any county, city, borough, village, township or other municipality, shall be taken by the port authority, without the authority or consent of such state, county, city, borough, village, township or other municipality, nor shall anything herein impair or invalidate in any way any bonded indebtedness of such state, county, city, borough, village, township or other municipality, nor impair the provisions of law regulating the payment into sinking funds of revenues derived from municipal property, or dedicating the revenues derived from any municipal property to a specific purpose.

The powers granted in this article shall not be exercised by the port authority until the legislatures of both states shall have approved of a comprehensive plan for the development of the port as hereinafter provided.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1989–1989 · leading case: Patrick Feeney v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 873 F.2d 628 (2d Cir. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Patrick Feeney v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 873 F.2d 628 (2d Cir. 1989). “Laws § 6407 (McKinney 1979) and N.J.Stat.Ann. § 32:1-7 (West 1963). The powers of the Port Authority are exercised by twelve commissioners, six being selected by each of the participating states.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.