A person who has been convicted of a first or second violation of section 39:4-50 of this Title, and in pursuance thereof has been imprisoned in a county jail or workhouse in the county in which the offense was committed, shall not, after commitment, be released therefrom until the term of imprisonment imposed has been served. A person imprisoned in the county jail or workhouse may in the discretion of the court, be released on a work release program.
No warden or other officer having custody of the county jail or workhouse shall release therefrom a person so committed, unless the person has been released by the court on a work release program, until the sentence has been served. A person sentenced to an inpatient rehabilitation program may upon petition by the treating agency be released, by the court, to an outpatient rehabilitation program for the duration of the original sentence.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to interfere in any way with the operation of a writ of habeas corpus, a proceeding in lieu of the prerogative writs, or an appeal.
The chief administrator shall adopt such rules and regulations to effectuate the provisions of this section as he shall deem necessary.
Amended 1951, c.23, s.31; 1977, c.29, s.5; 2003, c.315, s.3.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
15
cases (
6 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case:
State v. Anicama, 190 A.3d 474 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018).
State v. Anicama, 190 A.3d 474 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018).
· cites it 18× “] Finally, Michael's Law amended N.J.S.A. 39:4-51 : A person who has been convicted of [violating] a first or second violation of section 39:4-50 of this Title, and in pursuance thereof has been imprisoned in a county jail or workhouse in the county in which the offense was…”
State v. Grabowski, 908 A.2d 861 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2006).
· cites it 12× “39:4-50 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-51, and the ruling in State v.”
State of New Jersey Vs. Pedro C. Anicama (06-16, Hudson Cnty. & Statewide) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018).
· cites it 16× “] Finally, Michael's Law amended N.J.S.A. 39:4-51: A person who has been convicted of [violating] a first or second violation of section 39:4- 50 of this Title, and in pursuance thereof has been imprisoned in a county jail or workhouse in the county in which the offense was…”
State of New Jersey v. Robert Van Pelt (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2024).
· cites it 2× “39:3-61; consumption of alcohol in a motor vehicle, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(a); open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle, N.”
State of New Jersey v. Juan A. Lema (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2024).
· cites it 2× “39:4-96; consumption of alcohol while driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(a); having an open container of alcohol, N.”
In Re Registrant S.O. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025).
· cites it 2× “39:4-96; open/unsealed container of alcohol, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(b); uninsured motor vehicle, N.”
State of New Jersey Vs. David Guaman (6116, Passaic Cnty. & Statewide) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018).
“39:3-29, and possessing an open alcoholic beverage container, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(b). He appeals and argues: POINT I AS A MATTER OF LAW THE LOWER COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED [DEFENDANT'S] MOTION TO SUPPRESS HIS ALLEGED ORAL AND WRITTEN STATEMENTS DESPITE THE SAME BEING THE PRODUCT OF…”
— N.J. Stat. § 39:4-51(a) — 5 cases
State of New Jersey v. Robert Van Pelt (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2024).
“39:3-61; consumption of alcohol in a motor vehicle, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(a); open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle, N.”
State of New Jersey v. Juan A. Lema (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2024).
“39:4-96; consumption of alcohol while driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(a); having an open container of alcohol, N.”
— N.J. Stat. § 39:4-51(b) — 7 cases
In Re Registrant S.O. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025).
“39:4-96; open/unsealed container of alcohol, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(b); uninsured motor vehicle, N.”
State of New Jersey Vs. David Guaman (6116, Passaic Cnty. & Statewide) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018).
“39:3-29, and possessing an open alcoholic beverage container, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(b). He appeals and argues: POINT I AS A MATTER OF LAW THE LOWER COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED [DEFENDANT'S] MOTION TO SUPPRESS HIS ALLEGED ORAL AND WRITTEN STATEMENTS DESPITE THE SAME BEING THE PRODUCT OF…”
State of New Jersey v. Robert Van Pelt (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2024).
“39:3-61; consumption of alcohol in a motor vehicle, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(a); open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle, N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.