New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 1-1-7 (2026)

Residence; rules for determining.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
For the purpose of determining residence for voting, the place of residence is governed by
the following rules:

  A. the residence of a person is that place in which his habitation is fixed, and to which,
whenever he is absent, he has the intention to return;

   B. the place where a person's family resides is presumed to be his place of residence, but a
person who takes up or continues his abode with the intention of remaining at a place other than
where his family resides is a resident where he abides;

    C. a change of residence is made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain
in another place. There can be only one residence;

    D. a person does not gain or lose residence solely by reason of his presence or absence
while employed in the service of the United States or of this state, or while a student at an
institution of learning, or while kept in an institution at public expense, or while confined in a
public prison or while residing upon an Indian or military reservation;

    E. no member of the armed forces of the United States, his spouse or his dependent is a
resident of this state solely by reason of being stationed in this state;

    F. a person does not lose his residence if he leaves his home and goes to another country,
state or place within this state for temporary purposes only and with the intention of returning;

   G. a person does not gain a residence in a place to which he comes for temporary purposes
only;

   H. a person loses his residence in this state if he votes in another state in an election
requiring residence in that state, and has not upon his return regained his residence in this state
under the provisions of the constitution of New Mexico;

   I. "residence" is computed by not including the day on which the person's residence
commences and by including the day of the election;

   J. a person does not acquire or lose residence by marriage only.

History: 1953 Comp., § 3-1-6, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 240, § 6; 1973, ch. 70, § 1.

                                          ANNOTATIONS

Cross references. — For residence not acquired or lost by presence or absence in federal or
state service or as student, see N.M. Const., art. VII, § 4.
Establishing physical presence. — Under Subsections C and H of this section, a person who
does not have a sufficient physical presence in a place to qualify that place as an abode or a
habitation (i.e., as a place where the person lives or resides, even if only part-time) must
establish such a physical presence in the place - that is, he must "remove" to the place - before
his voting residence can be changed to that place. Klumker v. Van Allred, 1991-NMSC-045, 112
N.M. 42, 811 P.2d 75.

Loss of residence status. — A person who physically leaves the county where he has resided
and then votes or qualifies to vote outside that county loses his residence in that county for
voting purposes. Klumker v. Van Allred, 1991-NMSC-045, 112 N.M. 42, 811 P.2d 75.

Multiple residences not precluded. — This section and 1-1-7.1 NMSA 1978 merely codify the
supreme court's pronouncement in State ex rel. Magee v. Williams, 1953-NMSC-082, 57 N.M.
588, 261 P.2d 131, and do not preclude the possibility of multiple residences. Apodaca v.
Chavez, 1990-NMSC-028, 109 N.M. 610, 788 P.2d 366.

Family home as permanent residence. — Political candidate's Santa Fe county family home
remained his permanent residence, even though he maintained a home in Rio Arriba county
where he resided with his wife and two children. Apodaca v. Chavez, 1990-NMSC-028, 109
N.M. 610, 788 P.2d 366.

Circumstantial evidence of intent to reside sufficient. — It is obviously difficult to prove an
intent to reside by direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence of intent is sufficient if it can be said
that it amounts to substantial evidence. State ex rel. Huning v. Los Chavez Zoning Comm'n.,
1982-NMSC-024, 97 N.M. 472, 641 P.2d 503, rev’g 1979-NMSC-088, 93 N.M. 655, 604 P.2d
121.

Change of residence is accomplished only by the act of moving to another place coupled with
the intent to remain in the other place. Kiehne v. Atwood, 1979-NMSC-098, 93 N.M. 657, 604
P.2d 123.

Residence for voting similar to residence for jury service. — There is a similarity between
residence for the purpose of voting and residence for the purpose of serving as a juror. State v.
Watkins, 1979-NMCA-003, 92 N.M. 470, 590 P.2d 169.

Right of Indian to vote. — There is nothing in the constitution or the statutes which prohibits an
Indian from voting in a proper election, provided he fulfills the statutory requirements required of
any other voter. Montoya v. Bolack, 1962-NMSC-073, 70 N.M. 196, 372 P.2d 387.

Reservation deemed residence for voting purposes. — A reservation lying within geographic
boundaries of the state is a part of the state, and residence for voting purposes, within the
meaning of the constitution, follows. Montoya v. Bolack, 1962-NMSC-073, 70 N.M. 196, 372
P.2d 387.

Polling places may be placed on reservations. — Inasmuch as there is residence on a
reservation for voting purposes, there is no prohibition to the location of polling places thereon.
Montoya v. Bolack, 1962-NMSC-073, 70 N.M. 196, 372 P.2d 387.

Vote cast outside residence of voter is void; it must be cast in person in the precinct in which
the voter has resided for the preceding 30 days. State ex rel. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs v. Board of
Cnty. Comm'rs, 1954-NMSC-124, 59 N.M. 9, 277 P.2d 960; Arledge v. Mabry, 1948-NMSC-047,
52 N.M. 303, 197 P.2d 884.

Franchise cannot be conferred on nonresident. — Former statute purporting to make
residents living on condemned lands residents of New Mexico in the constitutional sense did not
aid person living on condemned lands at Los Alamos project, since legislature could not
constitutionally confer the elective franchise on persons whose legal status was that of a
nonresident. Arledge v. Mabry, 1948-NMSC-047, 52 N.M. 303, 197 P.2d 884.

Candidate to file in district where he resides. — In order for a candidate for county
commission or state representative to qualify for those offices, he must file in the district where
he resides. 1966 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 66-30.

Change of residence by candidate. — In order to run in a certain district, a candidate can
change his residency at any time up to the filing date, so long as the legislative district is in the
same county. 1966 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 66-30.

Those residing on former public domain land may exercise elective franchise in both state
and federal elections, since the state retained jurisdiction over the area not inconsistent with
federal use. 1964 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 64-123.

No residence on purchased without consent of state. — Those people residing on land
obtained by the United States through the constitutional method may not establish their
residency so as to become electors; those residing on lands obtained by purchase without
obtaining the consent of the state are in a similar position. 1964 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 64-123.

Establishing residence. — "Residence" for voting and election purposes is established initially
by actual residence and intent to make that place a home. After "residence" is thus established,
the person may move elsewhere, and if he intends to return, his "residence" for voting and
election purposes remains as established. 1956 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 56-6445.

For those residing upon lands within military installations which formerly were part of
public domain, "residence" for voting purposes could be established thereon. The reasoning
behind this conclusion is that the state of New Mexico, as to these lands, exercised concurrent
jurisdiction with the federal government even though title was held by the federal government.
1956 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 56-6425.

Term "residence" has been defined as being synonymous with home or domicile denoting the
permanent dwelling place to which a party, when absent, intends to return and also as "that
place wherein he legally resides and has his domicile and from which, when temporarily absent,
he intends to return." 1956 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 55-6208.

No residence for those on lands over which federal government has control. — On any
lands over which the United States government has acquired exclusive control, except for the
purpose of service of civil and criminal process, no residence can be acquired for the purpose of
voting. 1953 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 53-5841.

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 25 Am. Jur. 2d Elections § 163 et seq.
Significance of place where one votes or registers to vote on question as to his domicile or
residence for other purposes, 107 A.L.R. 448.

Residence or inhabitancy within district or other political unit for which he is elected or appointed
as a necessary qualification of officer or candidate, in absence of express provision to the effect,
120 A.L.R. 672.

Military service, voting by persons in, 140 A.L.R. 1100, 147 A.L.R. 1443, 148 A.L.R. 1402, 149
A.L.R. 1466, 150 A.L.R. 1460, 151 A.L.R. 1464, 152 A.L.R. 1459, 153 A.L.R. 1434, 154 A.L.R.
1459, 155 A.L.R. 1459.

Domicile or residence of person in the armed forces, 149 A.L.R. 1471, 150 A.L.R. 1468, 151
A.L.R. 1468, 152 A.L.R. 1471, 153 A.L.R. 1442, 155 A.L.R. 1466, 156 A.L.R. 1465, 157 A.L.R.
1462, 158 A.L.R. 1474.

State voting rights of residents of federal military establishment, 34 A.L.R.2d 1193.

Absentee voters' laws: validity of, 97 A.L.R.2d 218.

Absentee voters' laws: construction and effect of, 97 A.L.R.2d 257.

Residence or domicile of student or teacher for purpose of voting, 98 A.L.R.2d 488, 44 A.L.R.3d
797.

29 C.J.S. Elections §§ 19 to 25.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Klumker v. Van Allred, 811 P.2d 75 (N.M. 1991).
Klumker v. Van Allred, 811 P.2d 75 (N.M. 1991). · cites it 18× “Klumker challenges these findings as not supported by substantial evidence and as flowing from an incorrect application of the New Mexico statute prescribing rules for determining residence for voting purposes, NMSA 1978, Section 1-1-7 (Repl.Pamp.1985). The precinct board…”
Apodaca v. Chavez, 788 P.2d 366 (N.M. 1990). · cites it 21× “, NMSA 1978, Section 1-1-7(A-J) (Repl.Pamp.1985). In pertinent part, that statute provides: For the purpose of determining residence for voting, the place of residence is governed by the following rules: A.”
Dupree v. Hiraga, 219 P.3d 1084 (Haw. 2009). “New Mexico’s elections statute contained the same basic definition of residency as HRS § 11-13(1), N.M. Stat. Ann. § 1-1-7 (A) (West 1978), as well as a list of additional principles which is similar in structure to HRS § 11-13, but with some variations in individual provisions,…”
State v. Watkins, 590 P.2d 169 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “We do not review additional evidence inasmuch as the trial court’s findings support the ruling that Casaus was a Sandoval County resident.”
Kiehne v. Atwood, 604 P.2d 123 (N.M. 1979). “§ 1-1-7, N.M.S.A.1978. The statute establishes a two-prong test to determine residency: a change of residence is accomplished only by the act of moving to another place coupled with the intent to remain in the other place.”
State ex rel. Huning v. Los Chavez Zoning Comm'n, 641 P.2d 503 (N.M. 1982). · cites it 2× “Berber testified only that their addresses, as they appeared on the voting lists, were not within the proposed district, or that the individuals appearing on the voting lists had moved out of the proposed district.”
State ex rel. Taylor v. Denney (N.M. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 12× “Motions to Quash Subpoenas 2Relators also argue that the district court should have determined whether Respondents were residents of Cloudcroft under the criteria set forth in Section 1-1-7 because there was insufficient evidence that they lived in Cloudcroft.”
Gutierrez v. Ornelas (D.N.M. 2022). “§ 1-4-2 (a) (West 2019) (stating that only qualified residents may register to vote); § 1-1-7 (West 1973) (stating that “the residence of a person is that place in which his habitation is fixed, and to which, whenever he is absent, he has the intention to return”); Searle v.”
— N.M. Stat. § 1-1-7(A) — 1 case
Klumker v. Van Allred, 811 P.2d 75 (N.M. 1991). “Klumker challenges these findings as not supported by substantial evidence and as flowing from an incorrect application of the New Mexico statute prescribing rules for determining residence for voting purposes, NMSA 1978, Section 1-1-7 (Repl.Pamp.1985). The precinct board…”
— N.M. Stat. § 1-1-7(B) — 2 cases
Apodaca v. Chavez, 788 P.2d 366 (N.M. 1990). “, NMSA 1978, Section 1-1-7(A-J) (Repl.Pamp.1985). In pertinent part, that statute provides: For the purpose of determining residence for voting, the place of residence is governed by the following rules: A.”
Klumker v. Van Allred, 811 P.2d 75 (N.M. 1991). “Klumker challenges these findings as not supported by substantial evidence and as flowing from an incorrect application of the New Mexico statute prescribing rules for determining residence for voting purposes, NMSA 1978, Section 1-1-7 (Repl.Pamp.1985). The precinct board…”
— N.M. Stat. § 1-1-7(C) — 2 cases
Klumker v. Van Allred, 811 P.2d 75 (N.M. 1991). “Klumker challenges these findings as not supported by substantial evidence and as flowing from an incorrect application of the New Mexico statute prescribing rules for determining residence for voting purposes, NMSA 1978, Section 1-1-7 (Repl.Pamp.1985). The precinct board…”
Apodaca v. Chavez, 788 P.2d 366 (N.M. 1990). “, NMSA 1978, Section 1-1-7(A-J) (Repl.Pamp.1985). In pertinent part, that statute provides: For the purpose of determining residence for voting, the place of residence is governed by the following rules: A.”
— N.M. Stat. § 1-1-7(F) — 1 case
State v. Watkins, 590 P.2d 169 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979). “We do not review additional evidence inasmuch as the trial court’s findings support the ruling that Casaus was a Sandoval County resident.”
— N.M. Stat. § 1-1-7(H) — 1 case
Klumker v. Van Allred, 811 P.2d 75 (N.M. 1991). “Klumker challenges these findings as not supported by substantial evidence and as flowing from an incorrect application of the New Mexico statute prescribing rules for determining residence for voting purposes, NMSA 1978, Section 1-1-7 (Repl.Pamp.1985). The precinct board…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.