liens.
While farm products are located in a jurisdiction, the local law of that jurisdiction
governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection and the priority of an
agricultural lien on the farm products.
History: 1978 Comp., § 55-9-302, enacted by Laws 2001, ch. 139, § 22.
OFFICIAL COMMENTS
UCC Official Comments © by ALI & the NCCUSL. Reproduced with permission of the
PEB for the UCC. All rights reserved.
1. Source. New.
2. Agricultural Liens. This section provides choice-of-law rules for agricultural liens
on farm products. Perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and priority all
are governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the farm products are located. Other
choice-of-law rules, including Section 1-301 [55-1-301 NMSA 1978], determine which
jurisdiction’s law governs other matters, such as the secured party’s rights on default.
See Section 9-301 [55-9-301 NMSA 1978], Comment 2. Inasmuch as no agricultural
lien on proceeds arises under this Article, this section does not expressly apply to
proceeds of agricultural liens. However, if another statute creates an agricultural lien on
proceeds, it may be appropriate for courts to apply the choice-of-law rule in this section
to determine priority in the proceeds.
ANNOTATIONS
Cross references. — For Farm Products Secured Interest Act, see 56-13-1 NMSA
1958.
Repeals and reenactments. — Laws 2001, ch. 139, § 22 repealed former 55-9-302
NMSA 1978, as amended by Laws 1996, ch. 47, § 63, and enacted a new section,
effective July 1, 2001.
Notes of Decisions
Sec. Pac. Fin. Servs. v. Signfilled Corp., 956 P.2d 837 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 3× “As in this ease, when a secured party assigns a perfected security interest there is no requirement that the assignment be filed “in order to continue the perfected status of the security interest against creditors of and transferees from the original debtor.”
Jones v. Beavers, 866 P.2d 362 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 2× “Section 55-9-302(3)(b) provides in relevant part: “The filing of a financing statement .”
Valley Fed. Sav. Bank v. Stahl, 793 P.2d 851 (N.M. 1990).
“Sections 55-9-302(1), -305. Associated Milk Producers claims that the description contained in the financing statement filed by Bank of America on December 7, 1983, did not adequately describe the capital retains.”
Greeman Motor, Inc. v. United New Mexico Bank (In Re Greeman Motors, Inc.), 48 B.R. 611 (Bankr. D.N.M. 1985).
· cites it 2× “§ 55-9-302 for perfection of a security interest states: (1)Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this article. The evidence in this case indicates that the…”
Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Lane (In Re Cattle Complex Corp.), 61 B.R. 526 (Bankr. D.N.M. 1986).
· cites it 2× “N.M. Stat.Ann. § 55-9-302(1) (1978). Also, under New Mexico law an unperfected security interest is subordinate to the rights of a lien creditor, including a trustee in bankruptcy.”
— N.M. Stat. § 55-9-302(1) — 2 cases
Valley Fed. Sav. Bank v. Stahl, 793 P.2d 851 (N.M. 1990).
“Sections 55-9-302(1), -305. Associated Milk Producers claims that the description contained in the financing statement filed by Bank of America on December 7, 1983, did not adequately describe the capital retains.”
— N.M. Stat. § 55-9-302(2) — 1 case
Sec. Pac. Fin. Servs. v. Signfilled Corp., 956 P.2d 837 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998).
“As in this ease, when a secured party assigns a perfected security interest there is no requirement that the assignment be filed “in order to continue the perfected status of the security interest against creditors of and transferees from the original debtor.”
— N.M. Stat. § 55-9-302(3)(b) — 2 cases
Sec. Pac. Fin. Servs. v. Signfilled Corp., 956 P.2d 837 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998).
“As in this ease, when a secured party assigns a perfected security interest there is no requirement that the assignment be filed “in order to continue the perfected status of the security interest against creditors of and transferees from the original debtor.”
Jones v. Beavers, 866 P.2d 362 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993).
“Section 55-9-302(3)(b) provides in relevant part: “The filing of a financing statement .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.