New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Civil Practice Law & Rules Law § 214 (2026)

Actions to be commenced within three years: for non-payment of money collected on execution; for penalty created by statute; to recover c...

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 214. Actions to be commenced within three years: for non-payment of
money collected on execution; for penalty created by statute; to recover
chattel; for injury to property; for personal injury; for malpractice
other than medical, dental or podiatric malpractice;  to annul a
marriage on the ground of fraud. The following actions must be
commenced  within three years:
  1. an action against a sheriff, constable or other officer for the
non-payment of money collected upon an execution;
  2. an action to recover upon a liability, penalty or forfeiture
created or imposed by statute except as provided in sections 213 and
215;
  3. an action to recover a chattel or damages for the taking or
detaining of a chattel;
  4. an action to recover damages for an injury to property except as
provided in section 214-c;
  5. an action to recover damages for a personal injury except as
provided in sections 214-b, 214-c, 214-i and 215;
  6. an action to recover damages for malpractice, other than medical,
dental or podiatric malpractice, regardless of whether the underlying
theory is based in contract or tort; and
  7. an action to annul a marriage on the ground of fraud; the time
within which the action must be commenced shall be computed from the
time the plaintiff discovered the facts constituting the fraud, but if
the plaintiff is a person other than the spouse whose consent was
obtained by fraud, the time within which the action must be commenced
shall be computed from the time, if earlier, that that spouse discovered
the facts constituting the fraud.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–1991 · leading case: Orvil T. Braswell & Parlee K. Braswell v. Flintkote Mines, Ltd., 723 F.2d 527 (7th Cir. 1984).
Orvil T. Braswell & Parlee K. Braswell v. Flintkote Mines, Ltd., 723 F.2d 527 (7th Cir. 1984). “2d 777, 778-79 (1962) (statute of limitations for malpractice action stayed when course of treatment, which includes wrongful acts or omissions, has run continuously); N.Y. Civil Prac.Law § 214 -b (1981 N.Y.Laws ch.”
Miwon, U.S.A., Inc. v. Crawford, 629 F. Supp. 153 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). “Plaintiff even alleges that the six year limitations period governing fraud should apply to Miwon’s "wrongful conversion”/misappropriation claim, against defendant Crawford.”
Fleischman v. Grinker, 769 F. Supp. 147 (S.D.N.Y. 1991). “2d 594 (1989) (holding that the statute of limitations for § 1983 actions in New York State is the three-year limit codified at Civil Practice Law § 214(5)). However, federal law determines the date on which the statutory period accrues.”
— N.Y. Civil Practice Law & Rules Law § 214(5) — 1 case
Fleischman v. Grinker, 769 F. Supp. 147 (S.D.N.Y. 1991). “2d 594 (1989) (holding that the statute of limitations for § 1983 actions in New York State is the three-year limit codified at Civil Practice Law § 214(5)). However, federal law determines the date on which the statutory period accrues.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.