New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Labor Law § 198 (2026)
Costs, remedies
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 198. Costs, remedies. 1. In any action instituted upon a wage claim by an employee or the commissioner in which the employee prevails, the court may allow such employee in addition to ordinary costs, a reasonable sum, not exceeding fifty dollars for expenses which may be taxed as costs. No assignee of a wage claim, except the commissioner, shall be benefited by this provision. 1-a. On behalf of any employee paid less than the wage to which they are entitled under the provisions of this article, the commissioner may bring any legal action necessary, including administrative action, to collect such claim and as part of such legal action, in addition to any other remedies and penalties otherwise available under this article, the commissioner shall assess against the employer the full amount of any such underpayment, and an additional amount as liquidated damages, unless the employer proves a good faith basis for believing that its underpayment of wages was in compliance with the law. Liquidated damages shall be calculated by the commissioner as no more than one hundred percent of the total amount of wages found to be due, except such liquidated damages may be up to three hundred percent of the total amount of the wages found to be due for a willful violation of section one hundred ninety-four of this article. In any action instituted in the courts upon a wage claim by an employee or the commissioner in which the employee prevails, the court shall allow such employee to recover the full amount of any underpayment, all reasonable attorney's fees, prejudgment interest as required under the civil practice law and rules, and, unless the employer proves a good faith basis to believe that its underpayment of wages was in compliance with the law, an additional amount as liquidated damages equal to one hundred percent of the total amount of the wages found to be due, except such liquidated damages may be up to three hundred percent of the total amount of the wages found to be due for a willful violation of section one hundred ninety-four of this article. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, liquidated damages shall not be applicable to violations of paragraph a of subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-one of this article where the employer paid the employee wages on a regular payday, no less frequently than semi-monthly. Such violations shall be subject to damages as follows: (i) no more than one hundred percent of the lost interest found to be due for the delayed payment of wages calculated using a daily interest rate for each day payment is late based on the annual rate of interest then in effect, as prescribed by the superintendent of financial services pursuant to section fourteen-a of the banking law for the employer's first violation; or (ii) for conduct occurring after the effective date of this paragraph, liquidated damages equal to one hundred percent of the total amount of wages found to be due in violation of paragraph a of subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-one of this article for any employer who, after the effective date of this paragraph, has been subject to one or more previous findings and orders for violations of paragraph a of subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-one of this article for which no proceeding for administrative or judicial review as provided in this chapter is pending and the time for initiation of such proceeding shall have expired and relating to employees performing the same work. For purposes of this subdivision, an order shall mean a single final order or determination made by the commissioner or a court of competent jurisdiction, regardless of the number of employees or the time period that was subject to such order. 1-b. If any employee is not provided within ten business days of his or her first day of employment a notice as required by subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-five of this article, he or she may recover in a civil action damages of fifty dollars for each work day that the violations occurred or continue to occur, but not to exceed a total of five thousand dollars, together with costs and reasonable attorney's fees. The court may also award other relief, including injunctive and declaratory relief, that the court in its discretion deems necessary or appropriate. On behalf of any employee not provided a notice as required by subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-five of this article, the commissioner may bring any legal action necessary, including administrative action, to collect such claim, and as part of such legal action, in addition to any other remedies and penalties otherwise available under this article, the commissioner may assess against the employer damages of fifty dollars for each work day that the violations occurred or continue to occur, but not to exceed a total of five thousand dollars. In any action or administrative proceeding to recover damages for violation of paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-five of this article, it shall be an affirmative defense that (i) the employer made complete and timely payment of all wages due pursuant to this article or article nineteen or article nineteen-A of this chapter to the employee who was not provided notice as required by subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-five of this article or (ii) the employer reasonably believed in good faith that it was not required to provide the employee with notice pursuant to subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-five of this article. 1-d. If any employee is not provided a statement or statements as required by subdivision three of section one hundred ninety-five of this article, he or she shall recover in a civil action damages of two hundred fifty dollars for each work day that the violations occurred or continue to occur, but not to exceed a total of five thousand dollars, together with costs and reasonable attorney's fees. The court may also award other relief, including injunctive and declaratory relief, that the court in its discretion deems necessary or appropriate. On behalf of any employee not provided a statement as required by subdivision three of section one hundred ninety-five of this article, the commissioner may bring any legal action necessary, including administrative action, to collect such claim, and as part of such legal action, in addition to any other remedies and penalties otherwise available under this article, the commissioner may assess against the employer damages of two hundred fifty dollars for each work day that the violations occurred or continue to occur, but not to exceed a total of five thousand dollars. In any action or administrative proceeding to recover damages for violation of subdivision three of section one hundred ninety-five of this article, it shall be an affirmative defense that (i) the employer made complete and timely payment of all wages due pursuant to this article or articles nineteen or nineteen-A of this chapter to the employee who was not provided statements as required by subdivision three of section one hundred ninety-five of this article or (ii) the employer reasonably believed in good faith that it was not required to provide the employee with statements pursuant to paragraph (e) of subdivision one of section one hundred ninety-five of this article. 2. The remedies provided by this article may be enforced simultaneously or consecutively so far as not inconsistent with each other. 3. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action to recover upon a liability imposed by this article must be commenced within six years. The statute of limitations shall be tolled from the date an employee files a complaint with the commissioner or the commissioner commences an investigation, whichever is earlier, until an order to comply issued by the commissioner becomes final, or where the commissioner does not issue an order, until the date on which the commissioner notifies the complainant that the investigation has concluded. Investigation by the commissioner shall not be a prerequisite to nor a bar against a person bringing a civil action under this section. All employees shall have the right to recover full wages, benefits and wage supplements and liquidated damages accrued during the six years previous to the commencing of such action, whether such action is instituted by the employee or by the commissioner. There is no exception to liability under this section for the unauthorized failure to pay wages, benefits or wage supplements. 4. In any civil action by an employee or by the commissioner, the employee or commissioner shall have the right to collect attorney's fees and costs incurred in enforcing any court judgment. Any judgment or court order awarding remedies under this section shall provide that if any amounts remain unpaid upon the expiration of ninety days following issuance of judgment, or ninety days after expiration of the time to appeal and no appeal is then pending, whichever is later, the total amount of judgment shall automatically increase by fifteen percent.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 500
cases (228 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co., 626 N.E.2d 29 (NY 1993).
Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co., 626 N.E.2d 29 (NY 1993). “Labor Law § 198 (1-a) provides in part that "[i]n any action instituted upon a wage claim by an employee * * * in which the employee prevails, the court shall allow such employee reasonable attorney’s fees”.”
Ryan v. Kellogg Partners Institutional Servs., 968 N.E.2d 947 (NY 2012). “Kellogg moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial on numerous grounds, and Ryan cross-moved for various kinds of relief, principally a judgment notwithstanding the verdict on his claim for willful violation of the Labor Law and attorney’s fees pursuant to…”
Fermin v. Las Delicias Peruanas Restaurant, Inc., 93 F. Supp. 3d 19 (E.D.N.Y 2015). “See N.Y. Lab Law §§ 198 (3), 663(3); Man Wei Shiu v.”
Inclan v. New York Hosp. Grp., Inc., 95 F. Supp. 3d 490 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). “564 § 7, amending N.Y. Labor Law § 198 (1-b). 6 Here, it is undisputed that the Restaurant did not provide plaintiffs with a wage notice form, either at hiring or annually on or before February 1.”
Schiferle v. Capital Fence Co., Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 7059 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). “Noting that a successful plaintiff “in a Labor Law Article 6 [wage] claim is automatically entitled to attorney’s fees by the express language of Labor Law § 198 (1-a)” as well as to “pre-judgment interest under CPLR 5001 (a),” plaintiff argued that the arbitrator, by “treating…”
Samuel Calderon v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 809 F.3d 111 (4th Cir. 2015). “See N.Y. Lab. Law §§ 198 (l-a), 663(1). Effective November 24, 2009, through April 8, 2011, liquidated damages in the amount of 25 percent of the overtime underpayments were allowed “unless the employer proves a good faith basis for believing that its underpayment of wages was…”
Santillan v. Henao, 822 F. Supp. 2d 284 (E.D.N.Y 2011). “See N.Y. Lab. Law § 198 (3); Chun Jie Yin, 2008 WL 906736 , at *6; Jowers v.”
Gertler v. Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, 2020 NY Slip Op 04731 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). “18, plus statutory prejudgment interest on those unpaid wages from the date each payment became due, and reasonable attorney's fees under Labor Law § 198(1-a), (b) denying those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on so much of the first and second…”
Santana v. Latino Express Restaurants, Inc., 198 F. Supp. 3d 285 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “N.Y. Lab. Law § 198 (l-a). As a result of these amendments bringing the statutes into alignment, a trend of denying cumulative liquidated damages has emerged within this Circuit.”
Rana v. Islam, 887 F.3d 118 (2d Cir. 2018). “372 § 1, amending N.Y. Labor Law § 198 (1-a) ). In 2010, the NYLL liquidated damages provision was amended again so that an employee may "recover the full amount of any underpayment, all reasonable attorney's fees, [and] prejudgment interest as required under the civil practice…”
AHA Sales, Inc. v. Creative Bath Prods., Inc., 58 A.D.3d 6 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008). “For instance, Labor Law § 198, pertaining to costs and remedies, provides for the recovery of costs and an attorney’s fee “[i]n any action instituted upon a wage claim by an employee or the commissioner” (Labor Law § 198 [1], [1-a]).”
Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc., 643 F.3d 352 (2d Cir. 2011). “Finally, we conclude that the district court’s determination that liquidated damages are not available under the NYLL was similarly premature. Pursuant to the version of NYLL § 198(l-a) in effect during Kuebel’s time at B & D, Kuebel is entitled to liquidated damages equal to…”
— N.Y. Labor Law § 198(3) — 6 cases
Romero v. La Revise Assocs. L.L.C., 968 F. Supp. 2d 639 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).
Mendoza v. Cornell Univ., 2023 NY Slip Op 02180 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
Patel v. Maybank Kim Eng Sec. USA INC., 2025 NY Slip Op 05194 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025).
Hernandez v. Quality Blacktop Servs., Inc. (E.D.N.Y 2021).
Badzio v. Americare Certified Special Servs., Inc., 2019 NY Slip Op 8389 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.