N.Y. Labor Law § 201
Laws and orders to be posted
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 201. Laws and orders to be posted. Wherever persons are employed who are affected by the provisions of this chapter or of the industrial code, the commissioner shall furnish to the employer copies or abstracts of such provisions, rules and orders as he may deem necessary affecting such persons. The copies or abstracts shall be in such language as the commissioner may require and shall be kept posted by the employer in a conspicuous place on each floor of the premises. Digital versions of such copies and abstracts shall also be made available through the employer's website or by email. Employers shall provide notice that documents required for physical posting are also available electronically. All other documents required to be physically posted at a worksite pursuant to state or federal law or regulation shall also be made electronically available in the manner described pursuant to this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: Truitt v. Salisbury Bank and Trust Co.
Truitt v. Salisbury Bank and Trust Co. (2022)
“N.Y. Lab. Law § 201 -d(2)(a). Protected activities expressly include "running for public office.”
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs (2003)
“2000); N.Y. Lab. Law §201 -c (West 2002); Tenn. Code *734 Ann.”
Marc Wiersum v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (2015)
“” N.Y. Lab. Law § 201 -d(2)(a)–(c). Yet under the majority’s rule, banks would be empowered to fire their officers with impunity when one donates to the political party of his choice, or smokes cigarettes, or hunts.”
Reiseck v. Universal Communications of Miami, Inc. (2010)
“Code § 8-107 ; (2) discriminated against her on the basis of her recreational activities, in violation of New York state law, N.Y. Lab. Law § 201 -d(2)(c); (3) withheld her overtime pay, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”), 29 U.”
CompassCare v. Hochul (2025)
“See Joint App’x at 200, 230-31 (notices of sexual harassment prevention policy, in compliance with N.Y. Lab. Law §201 -g); 33 id. at 213-17, 237-40 (notices of fringe benefits and hours, in compliance with N.”
Ullrich v. Hearst Corp. (1992)
“Ullrich____” Bernbach then initiated Ullrich’s action in New York State court alleging violation of New York’s Adoptive Parents’ Child Care Leave Law, N.Y. Labor L. § 201 -c, retaliatory discharge and defamation.”
Donovan v. INCORPORATION VILLAGE OF MALVERNE (2008)
“19, 2004) (claim brought under Labor Law § 201). Accordingly, any Civil Service Law claim predicated on events on or before August 5, 2002 are also time barred as are all of the plaintiff’s Labor Law claims.”
Jess D. McCavitt v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation (2001)
“Major incursions, however, have been made into that hoary doctrine, not the least of which is N.Y. Labor Law § 201 -d, barring employers from firing workers because of “legal recreational activities outside work hours, off of [sic] the employer’s premises and without use of the…”
Rusk v. New York State Thruway Authority (2014)
“” N.Y. Labor Law § 201 -d(l)(a). The evidence before this Court is that plaintiffs political affiliation was never discussed and there is nothing, besides plaintiffs speculation, that it played a role in John Barr’s decision to terminate plaintiff.”
Gordon v. Griffith (2000)
“Const, art 1, § 9; N.Y. Labor Law § 201 -d(2). Defendant has moved for dismissal.”
Greco v. The City of New York (2023)
“” N.Y. Labor Law § 201 -d(1)(a). Greco does not allege that he was investigated or fired because he ran for office, campaigned for a political candidate, or engaged in political fundraising.”
Mann v. Mezuyon, LLC (2026)
“, 57 F Supp 3d 328, 341 [SDNY 2014] [describing site owner's duty of care with respect to premises]; Labor Law § 201 [requiring that a workplace "be so constructed, equipped, arranged, operated and conducted as to provide a reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, health…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.