N.Y. Laws » CHAPTER Penal / PART Administrative Provisions / TITLE Nb / ARTICLE Terrorism
New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Penal Law § 490.10 (2026)

Soliciting or providing support for an act of terrorism in the second degree

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
§ 490.10 Soliciting or providing support for an act of terrorism in the
           second degree.
  A person commits soliciting or providing support for an act of
terrorism in the second degree when, with intent that material support
or resources will be used, in whole or in part, to plan, prepare, carry
out or aid in either an act of terrorism or the concealment of, or an
escape from, an act of terrorism, he or she raises, solicits, collects
or provides material support or resources.
  Soliciting or providing support for an act of terrorism in the second
degree is a class D felony.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2003–2017 · leading case: People v. Morales, 982 N.E.2d 580 (NY 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Morales, 982 N.E.2d 580 (NY 2012). “Donnino, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law § 490.10 at 299; see also Richard A.”
Handschu v. Special Servs. Div., 288 F. Supp. 2d 411 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). · cites it 4× “05 , or (iii) committing any offense described in N.Y. Penal Law §§ 490.10 , 490.15, 490.20, 490.”
United States v. Smith, 985 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). “2d 580, 585 (2012) (citing to Justice Donnino’s practice commentary to N.Y. Penal Law § 490.10 ); People v. Watson, 20 N.”
Handschu v. Police Dep't of New York, 241 F. Supp. 3d 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). · cites it 3× “05, or *450 (iii) committing any offense described in N.Y. Penal Law §§ 490.10 , 490.15, 490.20, 490.”
People v. Morales, 86 A.D.3d 147 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). “statutes from which Penal Law article 490’s definition of such intent appears to have been derived in relevant part (see Greenberg, supra, § 39:1, at 1738 [in enacting article 490 after 9/11, “the Legislature was able to act quickly because of the model provided by existing…”
In re Stewart, 42 A.D.3d 59 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). “this determination, we need not address the Committee’s additional assertion that automatic disbarment can be predicated on respondent’s conviction of conspiring to provide and conceal material support to terrorist activity ( 18 USC §§ 371 , 2339A), especially since the analog…”
People v. Morales, 81 A.D.3d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). “statutes from which Penal Law article 490’s definition of such intent appears to have been derived in relevant part (see Greenberg, supra, § 39:1, at 1738 [in enacting article 490 after 9/11, “the Legislature was able to act quickly because of the model provided by existing…”
Handschu v. Special Servs. Div., 288 F. Supp. 2d 404 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). “05 ; or (iii) committing any offense described in N.Y. Penal L. §§ 490.10 , 490.15, 490.20, 490.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.