The following definitions apply in this Article:
(1) "Arbitration organization" means an association, agency, board, commission, or other entity that is neutral and initiates, sponsors, or administers an arbitration proceeding or is involved in the appointment of an arbitrator.
(2) "Arbitrator" means an individual appointed to render an award, alone or with others, in a controversy that is subject to an agreement to arbitrate.
(3) "Court" means a court of competent jurisdiction in this State.
(4) "Knowledge" means actual knowledge.
(5) "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government; governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality; public corporation; or any other legal or commercial entity.
(6) "Record" means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form. (2003-345, s. 2)
Notes of Decisions
Faison & Gillespie v. Lorant, 654 S.E.2d 47 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 8× “See generally N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-569.1 to 1-569.31 (2005).”
Dalenko v. Peden Gen. Contractors, Inc., 676 S.E.2d 625 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “, which was repealed in 2003 and superceded by the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-569.1 et seq. It is the earlier statute that controls in the instant case.”
Eisinger v. Robinson, 596 S.E.2d 831 (N.C. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-569.1 et seq. (2003).”
Capps v. Virrey, 645 S.E.2d 825 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “20; N.C. Gen.Stat. §§ 1-569.1 through 1-569.31.”
Carroll v. Ferro, 633 S.E.2d 708 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “This section was repealed effective 1 January 2004, and replaced by Article 45C of Chapter 1, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-569.1 , et seq.”
Bourgeois v. Lapelusa, 2025 NCBC 16 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2025).
· cites it 5× “This proceeding is governed by the North Carolina Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, N.C.G.S. §§ 1-569.1 et seq. The confirmation of an arbitration award is subject to N.”
Blanton v. Isenhower, 674 S.E.2d 694 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009).
“*169 §§ 1-569.1 et seq., a trial court shall modify or correct an arbitration award if: (1) There was an evident mathematical miscalculation or an evident mistake in the description of a person, thing, or property referred to in the award; (2) The arbitrator has made an award on…”
R.E.M. Constr., Inc. v. Cleveland Constr. (N.C. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 2× ““Judicial review of an arbitration award is confined to a determination of whether there exists one of the specific grounds for vacation of an award” under the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-569.1 et seq. (2021).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.