NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1 (2026)

Applications for property tax exemption or exclusion; annual review of property exempted or excluded from property tax

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 105 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Application. - Every owner of property claiming exemption or exclusion from property taxes under the provisions of this Subchapter has the burden of establishing that the property is entitled to it. If the property for which the exemption or exclusion is claimed is appraised by the Department of Revenue, the application shall be filed with the Department. Otherwise, the application shall be filed with the assessor of the county in which the property is situated. An application must contain a complete and accurate statement of the facts that entitle the property to the exemption or exclusion and must indicate the municipality, if any, in which the property is located. Each application filed with the Department of Revenue or an assessor shall be submitted on a form approved by the Department. Application forms shall be made available by the assessor and the Department, as appropriate.

Except as provided below, an owner claiming an exemption or exclusion from property taxes must file an application for the exemption or exclusion annually during the listing period:

(1) No application required. - Owners of the following exempt or excluded property do not need to file an application for the exemption or exclusion to be entitled to receive it:

a. Property exempt from taxation under G.S. 105-278.1 or G.S. 105-278.2(b).

b. Special classes of property excluded from taxation under G.S. 105-275(15), (16), (26), (31), (32a), (33), (34), (37), (40), (42), or (44).

c. Property classified for taxation at a reduced valuation under G.S. 105-277(g) or G.S. 105-277.9.

(2) Single application required. - An owner of one or more of the following properties eligible for a property tax benefit must file an application for the benefit to receive it. Once the application has been approved, the owner does not need to file an application in subsequent years unless new or additional property is acquired or improvements are added or removed, necessitating a change in the valuation of the property, or there is a change in the use of the property or the qualifications or eligibility of the taxpayer necessitating a review of the benefit. The properties are as follows:

a. Property exempted from taxation under G.S. 105-278.2(a), 105-278.3, 105-278.4, 105-278.5, 105-278.6, 105-278.7, or 105-278.8.

b. Special classes of property excluded from taxation under G.S. 105-275(3), (7), (8), (12), (17), (18), (19), (20), (21), (31e), (35), (36), (38), (39), (41), (45), (46), (47), (48), or (49) or under G.S. 131A-21.

c. Special classes of property classified for taxation at a reduced valuation under G.S. 105-277(h), 105-277.02, 105-277.1, 105-277.1C, 105-277.10, 105-277.13, 105-277.14, 105-277.15, 105-277.17, or 105-278.

d. Property owned by a nonprofit homeowners' association but where the value of the property is included in the appraisals of property owned by members of the association under G.S. 105-277.8.

e. Repealed by Session Laws 2008-35, s. 1.2, effective for taxes imposed for taxable years beginning on or after July 1, 2008.

(a1) Late Application. - Upon a showing of good cause by the applicant for failure to make a timely application, an application for exemption or exclusion filed after the close of the listing period may be approved by the Department of Revenue, the board of equalization and review, the board of county commissioners, or the governing body of a municipality, as appropriate. An untimely application for exemption or exclusion approved under this subsection applies only to property taxes levied by the county or municipality in the calendar year in which the untimely application is filed.

(b) Approval and Appeal Process. - The Department of Revenue or the assessor to whom an application for exemption or exclusion is submitted must review the application and either approve or deny the application. Approved applications shall be filed and made available to all taxing units in which the exempted or excluded property is situated. If the Department denies an application for exemption or exclusion, it shall notify the taxpayer, who may appeal the denial to the Property Tax Commission.

If an assessor denies an application for exemption or exclusion, the assessor must notify the owner of the decision and the owner may appeal the decision to the board of equalization and review or the board of county commissioners, as appropriate, and from the county board to the Property Tax Commission. If the notice of denial covers property located within a municipality, the assessor shall send a copy of the notice and a copy of the application to the governing body of the municipality. The municipal governing body shall then advise the owner whether it will adopt the decision of the county board or require the owner to file a separate appeal with the municipal governing body. In the event the owner is required to appeal to the municipal governing body and that body renders an adverse decision, the owner may appeal to the Property Tax Commission. Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the governing body of a municipality from denying an application which has been approved by the assessor or by the county board provided the owner's rights to notice and hearing are not abridged. Applications handled separately by a municipality shall be filed in the office of the person designated by the governing body, or in the absence of such designation, in the office of the chief fiscal officer of the municipality.

(c) Discovery of Property. - When an owner of property that may be eligible for exemption or exclusion neither lists the property nor files an application for exemption or exclusion, the assessor or the Department of Revenue, as appropriate, shall proceed to discover the property. If, upon appeal, the owner demonstrates that the property meets the conditions for exemption or exclusion, the body hearing the appeal may approve the exemption or exclusion. Discovery of the property by the Department or the county shall automatically constitute a discovery by any taxing unit in which the property has a taxable situs.

(d) Roster of Exempted and Excluded Property. - The assessor shall prepare and maintain a roster of all property in the county that is granted tax relief through classification or exemption. On or before November 1 of each year, the assessor must send a report to the Department of Revenue summarizing the information contained in the roster. The report must be in the format required by the Department. The assessor must also send the Department a copy of the roster upon the request of the Department. As to affected real and personal property, the roster shall set forth:

(1) The name of the owner of the property.

(2) A brief description of the property.

(3) A statement of the use to which the property is put.

(4) A statement of the value of the property.

(5) The total value of exempt property in the county and in each municipality therein.

(e) Annual Review of Exempted or Excluded Property. - Pursuant to G.S. 105-296(l), the assessor must annually review at least one-eighth of the parcels in the county exempted or excluded from taxation to verify that the parcels qualify for the exemption or exclusion. (1973, c. 695, s. 8; c. 1252; 1981, c. 54, ss. 2, 3; c. 86, s. 2; c. 915; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 982, s. 22; 1987, c. 45, s. 1; c. 295, ss. 5, 6; c. 680, ss. 1-3; c. 813, s. 13; 1989, c. 674, s. 2; c. 723, s. 2; 1991, c. 34, s. 1; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 975, s. 3; 1993, c. 459, s. 3; 1995, c. 41, s. 7; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 646, s. 16; 1997-23, s. 4; 2000-140, s. 72(b); 2001-139, s. 1; 2007-484, s. 43.7T(b); 2007-497, s. 2.4; 2008-35, s. 1.3; 2008-107, s. 28.11(g); 2008-171, ss. 3, 7(c); 2009-445, s. 23(a), (c)-(e); 2009-481, s. 3; 2018-5, s. 38.10(d); 2019-123, s. 1; 2019-177, s. 9(c); 2021-180, s. 42.12(b).)

§§ 105-282.2 through 105-282.6. Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 12A.

Taxation of Lessees and Users of Tax-Exempt Cropland or Forestland.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases, 1984–2015 · leading case: In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp., 354 S.E.2d 468 (N.C. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp., 354 S.E.2d 468 (N.C. 1987). · cites it 6× “The Court of Appeals held, and we agree, that although the decision by the county board to grant or deny an exemption is a discretionary one, N.C.G.S. § 105-282.1(c), it is reviewable by the Property Tax Commission.”

In re Appeal of the Church of the Creator, 402 S.E.2d 874 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 16× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1 . The owner must file an application for exemption each year during the listing period.”

In Re the Univ. for the Study of Human Goodness & Creative Grp. Work, 582 S.E.2d 645 (N.C. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1 (a) (2001). The Commission found as a fact and concluded that taxpayer had failed to prove that its use of the restaurant property was wholly and exclusively for an educational purpose.”

In re the Appeal of Blue Ridge Hous. of Bakersville LLC, 738 S.E.2d 802 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1 , each county tax assessor must annually review at least one-eighth of tax-exempt property in the county.”

In re Appeal of Valley Proteins, Inc., 494 S.E.2d 111 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 11× “The dispositive issue on appeal is whether taxpayer’s listing setting forth its intent to claim a Res Rec property tax exemption satisfies the requirements of G.S. 105-282.1. The County argues that because taxpayer did not properly submit its application for exemption on a form…”

In Re the Appeal of the Maharishi Spiritual Ctr. of Am., 569 S.E.2d 3 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “TYSON, Judge, dissenting. The majority did not properly apply the standards for judicial review of decisions of the North Carolina Property Tax Commission ("Commission") and has ignored the burden imposed on the taxpayer by N.”

In re Wesleyan Educ. Ctr., 316 S.E.2d 87 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “Granting an exemption to unlisted property would not jeopardize the budget adopted by the county.”

In re Vienna Baptist Church, 773 S.E.2d 97 (N.C. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Therefore, in order to qualify for the religious property tax exemption, Appellant has the burden of proving that it was using a building on the property wholly and exclusively used for religious purposes as of 1 January 2012.”

In Re Appeal of David H. Murdock Rsch. Inst., 725 S.E.2d 619 (N.C. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “1 (a) (2011), “[e]very owner of property claiming exemption or exclusion from property taxes under the provisions of this Subchapter has the burden of establishing that the property is entitled to it[,]” and “must file an application for the exemption or exclusion annually…”

In re the Appeal of R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 327 S.E.2d 607 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “§ 105-277(a) as it is required to do by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1 (a) (Cum. Supp.”

In re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp., 340 S.E.2d 752 (N.C. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “The plain intent and thrust of G.S. 105-282.1(b), G.S. 105-322, and G.S.”

— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1(a) — 5 cases

In re Appeal of the Church of the Creator, 402 S.E.2d 874 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991). “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1 . The owner must file an application for exemption each year during the listing period.”

In Re the Appeal of the Maharishi Spiritual Ctr. of Am., 569 S.E.2d 3 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002). “TYSON, Judge, dissenting. The majority did not properly apply the standards for judicial review of decisions of the North Carolina Property Tax Commission ("Commission") and has ignored the burden imposed on the taxpayer by N.”

In re Appeal of Valley Proteins, Inc., 494 S.E.2d 111 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997). “The dispositive issue on appeal is whether taxpayer’s listing setting forth its intent to claim a Res Rec property tax exemption satisfies the requirements of G.S. 105-282.1. The County argues that because taxpayer did not properly submit its application for exemption on a form…”

In re Wesleyan Educ. Ctr., 316 S.E.2d 87 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984). “Granting an exemption to unlisted property would not jeopardize the budget adopted by the county.”

In re Vienna Baptist Church, 773 S.E.2d 97 (N.C. Ct. App. 2015). “Therefore, in order to qualify for the religious property tax exemption, Appellant has the burden of proving that it was using a building on the property wholly and exclusively used for religious purposes as of 1 January 2012.”

— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1(a)(5) — 1 case

— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1(b) — 1 case

In re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp., 340 S.E.2d 752 (N.C. Ct. App. 1986). “The plain intent and thrust of G.S. 105-282.1(b), G.S. 105-322, and G.S.”

— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-282.1(c) — 3 cases

In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp., 354 S.E.2d 468 (N.C. 1987). “The Court of Appeals held, and we agree, that although the decision by the county board to grant or deny an exemption is a discretionary one, N.C.G.S. § 105-282.1(c), it is reviewable by the Property Tax Commission.”

In re Wesleyan Educ. Ctr., 316 S.E.2d 87 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984). “Granting an exemption to unlisted property would not jeopardize the budget adopted by the county.”

In re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp., 340 S.E.2d 752 (N.C. Ct. App. 1986). “The plain intent and thrust of G.S. 105-282.1(b), G.S. 105-322, and G.S.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.