The purposes of this Article are to provide for the financial support of dependent children; to enforce spousal support when a child support order is being enforced; to provide that public assistance paid to dependent children is a supplement to the support required to be provided by the responsible parent; to provide that the payment of public assistance creates a debt to the State; to provide that the acceptance of public assistance operates as an assignment of the right to child support; to provide for the location of absent parents; to provide for a determination that a responsible parent is able to support his children; and to provide for enforcement of the responsible parent's obligation to furnish support and to provide for the establishment and administration of a program of child support enforcement in North Carolina. (1975, c. 827, s. 1; 1977, 2nd Sess., c. 1186, s. 1; 1985, c. 506, s. 2.)
Notes of Decisions
Rosero v. Blake, 563 S.E.2d 248 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 4× “2d 865, 867 (1981) (quoting N.C. Gen.Stat. § 110-128 (1999)). However, "`[t]he entire thrust of a civil action under G.”
Carter v. Morrow, 562 F. Supp. 311 (W.D.N.C. 1983).
· cites it 3× “See N.C.G.S. § 110-128 et seq. The Act requires each state to develop and adopt, with federal approval, a plan for the delivery of IV-D services, and spells out in considerable detail what that plan shall contain.”
Wake Cnty. Ex Rel. Carrington v. Townes, 281 S.E.2d 765 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981).
· cites it 2× “; G.S. 110-128 (1979 Cum. Supp.). The County has a statutory duty to bring paternity proceedings against, and to establish support obligations from, putative fathers.”
Durham Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Williams, 277 S.E.2d 865 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981).
“G.S. 110-128. It is, therefore, at once clear that the provisions of Chapter 110 have no application, and there is no enforceable duty to support a child under that Chapter, until somebody is determined to be a “responsible parent.”
Guilford Cnty. Ex Rel. Holt v. Puckett, 664 S.E.2d 362 (N.C. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 8× “N.C. Gen.Stat. § 110-128 (2007). Plaintiff mother has been receiving financial support for her child from plaintiff agency, and nothing in the record suggests she will lose that support regardless of the outcome of this appeal.”
State ex rel. Terry v. Marrow, 321 S.E.2d 575 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984).
“G.S. 110-128 addresses the broad purposes of this Artide: The purposes of this Artide are to provide for the financial support of dependent children; to provide that public assistance paid to dependent children is a supplement to the support required to be provided by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.