NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-126 (2026)
Title of Article
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 136
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This Article may be cited as the Outdoor Advertising Control Act. (1967, c. 1248, s. 1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1975–2007 · leading case: Morris Commc'ns Corp. v. Bd. of Adjustment for Gastonia, 583 S.E.2d 419 (N.C. Ct. App. 2003).
Morris Commc'ns Corp. v. Bd. of Adjustment for Gastonia, 583 S.E.2d 419 (N.C. Ct. App. 2003). “(5) The ordinance purports to regulate a field for which a State or federal statute clearly shows a legislative intent to provide a complete and integrated regulatory scheme to the exclusion of local regulation.”
Nat'l Advert. Co. v. North Carolina Dep't of Transp., 478 S.E.2d 248 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996). “section 136-126 et. seq. require the DOT to pay just compensation for its sign.”
Whiteco Indus., Inc. v. Harrelson, 434 S.E.2d 229 (N.C. Ct. App. 1993). “In Whiteco, the Court held that petitioner’s permit was properly revoked under the Outdoor Advertising Control Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 136-126 to 140 (1986 and Supp.”
PNE AOA Media, L.L.C. v. Jackson Cnty., 554 S.E.2d 657 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001). “Preemption PNE first argues that the Jackson County sign moratorium preempted North Carolina’s Outdoor Advertising Control Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-126 , et. seq. (1999), because it cut short the statutory thirty-day right to cure defects in outdoor advertising provided *475…”
Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Tolson, 582 S.E.2d 717 (N.C. Ct. App. 2003). “The regulation at issue was promulgated by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (“NCDOT”) pursuant to the Outdoor Advertising Control Act (“OACA”), codified at N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-126 (2001). The OACA was passed in 1967 to control the placement, maintenance, and…”
Lamar Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. City of Hendersonville Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 573 S.E.2d 637 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002). “The General Assembly has conferred upon cities the power to enact ordinances to “define, prohibit, regulate, or abate acts, omissions, or conditions, detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of its citizens and the peace and dignity of the city .”
Ace-Hi, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp., 319 S.E.2d 294 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984). “III The Outdoor Advertising Control Act (OACA), codified at N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 136-126 to -140 (1981 and Supp.”
R. O. Givens, Inc. v. Town of Nags Head, 294 S.E.2d 388 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982). “Thus the trial court was required to consider the scope of the state Outdoor Advertising Control Act, G.S. 136-126, adopted by our legislature to implement the Federal Highway Beautification Act, 23 U.”
Naegele Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Harrelson, 434 S.E.2d 244 (N.C. Ct. App. 1993). “Analysis of this issue involves examination of the inter-relationship, if any, between the Outdoor Advertising Control Act, N.C.G.S. §§ 136-126 to -140 (hereafter “OACA”), and the Junkyard Control Act, N.”
Whiteco Indus., Inc. v. Harrington, 434 S.E.2d 234 (N.C. Ct. App. 1993). “In Whiteco Metrocom, this Court held that petitioner’s permit was properly revoked under the Outdoor Advertising Control Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 136-126 to -140 (1986 and Supp.”
Lamar OCI South Corp. v. Stanly Cnty. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 650 S.E.2d 37 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007). “Preemption Lamar argues that the County's zoning ordinance prohibiting the relocation of the billboard is preempted by the North Carolina Outdoor Advertising Control Act ("OACA"), N.C. Gen.Stat. § 136-126 et seq., and corresponding DOT regulations.”
Days Inn of Am., Inc. v. Bd. of Transp., 211 S.E.2d 864 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975). “Respondents’ Appeal Respondents’ appeal presents the question of whether the Outdoor Advertising Control Act, G.S. 136-126 et seq., became effective on 17 July 1972.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.