NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-89.180 (2026)

Legislative findings

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 136 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds that the existing State road system is becoming increasingly congested and overburdened with traffic in many areas of the State; that the sharp surge of vehicle miles traveled is overwhelming the State's ability to build and pay for adequate road improvements; and that an adequate answer to this challenge will require the State to be innovative and utilize several new approaches to transportation improvements in North Carolina.

Toll funding of highway and bridge construction is feasible in North Carolina and can contribute to addressing the critical transportation needs of the State. A toll program can speed the implementation of needed transportation improvements by funding some projects with tolls. (2002-133, s. 1.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Wideni77 v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., & I-77 Mobility Partners LLC, 800 S.E.2d 441 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wideni77 v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., & I-77 Mobility Partners LLC, 800 S.E.2d 441 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-89.180 (2015). It is clear that achievement of this stated legislative policy and the fixing, revising, charging, retaining, enforcing, and collecting of tolls require expertise.”

WidenI77 v. NC Dep't of Transp. (N.C. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-89.180 (2015). It is clear that achievement of this stated legislative policy and the fixing, revising, charging, retaining, enforcing, and collecting of tolls require expertise.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.