N.C. Gen. Stat. » Chapter 153A
NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-124 (2026)

Enumeration not exclusive

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 153A CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The enumeration in this Article or other portions of this Chapter of specific powers to define, regulate, prohibit, or abate acts, omissions, or conditions is not exclusive, nor is it a limit on the general authority to adopt ordinances conferred on counties by G.S. 153A-121. (1973, c. 822, s. 1.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1989–2012 · leading case: Lanvale Props., LLC v. Cnty. of Cabarrus, 731 S.E.2d 800 (N.C. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lanvale Props., LLC v. Cnty. of Cabarrus, 731 S.E.2d 800 (N.C. 2012). · cites it 14× “” N.C.G.S. § 153A-124. This language can only mean that the General Assembly did not intend to limit county powers to those it specifically named in each statute at the time of its passage, but rather anticipated giving local governing bodies significant discretion in how to…”
PNE AOA Media, L.L.C. v. Jackson Cnty., 554 S.E.2d 657 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001). “See G.S. 153A-124 (Specific powers enumerated in Article 6, Chapter 153A to “regulate, prohibit or abate acts, omissions, or conditions is not exclusive [or] a limit on the general authority to adopt ordinances .”
Summey Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Cnty. of Henderson, 386 S.E.2d 439 (N.C. Ct. App. 1989). “See G.S. 153A-124 (Specific powers enumerated in Article 6, Chapter 153A to “regulate, prohibit or abate acts, omissions or conditions is not exclusive [or] a limit on the general authority to adopt ordinances .”
Transylvania Cnty. v. Moody, 565 S.E.2d 720 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002). “See G.S. 153A-124 (Specific powers enumerated in Article 6, [or other portions of] Chapter 153A to “regulate, prohibit or abate acts, omissions or conditions [are] not exclusive [or] a limit on the general authority to adopt ordinances .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.