NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 42-4 (2026)

Recovery for use and occupation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 42 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When any person occupies land of another by the permission of such other, without any express agreement for rent, or upon a parol lease which is void, the landlord may recover a reasonable compensation for such occupation, and if by such parol lease a certain rent was reserved, such reservation may be received as evidence of the value of the occupation. (1868-9, c. 156, s. 5; Code, s. 1746; Rev., s. 1986; C.S., s. 2344.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1976–2018 · leading case: Raleigh-Durham Airport Auth. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 429 F. Supp. 1069 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 1976).
Raleigh-Durham Airport Auth. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 429 F. Supp. 1069 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 1976). · cites it 5× “calculation properly carried out under the general method proposed by plaintiff and discussed above (that method being a rea *1085 sonable one) can produce a figure for landing fees which is simultaneously reasonable under Section 63-53(5), reasonable in light of the commerce…”
Northside Station Assocs. P'ship v. Maddry, 413 S.E.2d 319 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 6× “Northside seeks reversal of the trial court's order and advances in this Court the following arguments: 1) that the Agreement is an assignment and not a sublease since the tenant reserved no portion of the original lease term and that, *321 therefore, Northside has a direct…”
Tai Sports, Inc. v. Hall, 2012 NCBC 62 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2012). · cites it 3× “TAI offered into evidence the Lease Agreement between Vega Real Estate and TAI for both Parcel A and Parcel B.”
Simon v. Mock, 331 S.E.2d 300 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “Although not denominated as such in the complaint, this cause of action appears to be based on, and we will treat it as based on, G.S. 42-4, which enables a property owner to recover “reasonable compensation” for occupation of her property.”
Zagaroli v. Neill, 2018 NCBC 25 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2018). · cites it 9× “Third and last, Zagaroli contends that, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 42-4 , he is entitled to unpaid rent for Reclamation’s use of two buildings referred to as the “Zag Building” and the “Conover Building.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.