NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-33 (2026)

Supreme Court to prescribe appellate division rules of practice and procedure

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 7A CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules of practice and procedure designed to procure the expeditious and inexpensive disposition of all litigation in the appellate division. (1967, c. 108, s. 1.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1969–2005 · leading case: State v. Tutt, 615 S.E.2d 688 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Tutt, 615 S.E.2d 688 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “") (emphasis supplied); see also N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7A-33 (2003) ("The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules of practice and procedure designed to procure the expeditious and inexpensive disposition of all litigation in the appellate division.”

State v. Jones, 313 S.E.2d 264 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “IV, § 13(2); G.S. 7A-33. Finally, it should be noted that interlocutory orders in criminal cases have been held appealable in at least one case as a matter of North Carolina law.”

State v. Monroe, 410 S.E.2d 913 (N.C. 1991). · cites it 3× “See also N.C.G.S. § 7A-33 (1989). The defendant further argues that N.”

State v. Garnett, 167 S.E.2d 63 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969). “The defendant chose to submit the evidence in this case under the provisions of Rule 19(d) (2) as it was prior to its repeal on 11 February 1969 by the Supreme Court of North Carolina pursuant to authority contained in G.S. 7A-33. Rule 19 (d) (2), (which has been repealed…”

In Re Brown, 606 S.E.2d 900 (N.C. 2004). · cites it 9× “To that end, the General Assembly enacted N.C.G.S. § 7A-33, which states, "The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules of practice and procedure designed to procure the expeditious and inexpensive disposition of all litigation in the appellate division.”

In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 276, Brown, 599 S.E.2d 502 (S.C. 2004). · cites it 3× “To that end, the General Assembly enacted N.C.G.S. § 7A-33, which states, “The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules of practice and procedure designed to procure the expeditious and inexpensive disposition of all litigation in the appellate division.”

State v. Bennett, 297 S.E.2d 138 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982). “Pursuant to that article, the General Assembly has enacted the following pertinent statutes: — G.S. 7A-33. Supreme Court to prescribe appellate division rules of practice and procedure.”

State v. Riera, 169 S.E.2d 906 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969). “Rule 19(d) was prescribed and adopted as an amendment to Rule' 19 by the Supreme Court of North Carolina, in conference, on 11 February 1969, pursuant to’the authority'contained in G.S. 7A-33, and reads as follows: “(d) Evidence — How Stated.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.