NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-154.2 (2026)

Unethical conduct

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 90 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unethical conduct is defined as:

(1) The over-utilization or improper use, in the providing of treatment, physiological therapeutics, radiographics, or any other service not commensurate with the stated diagnosis and clinical findings. This determination shall be based upon the collective findings and experience of the Board utilizing the best available, relative information and advice. There must be a rationale for the services provided the patient.

(2) The billing or otherwise charging of a fee to a third party payor for a service offered by the doctor as a free service, which service is accepted as a free service by any patient when, in fact, the doctor of chiropractic is transmitting any charge to a third-party payor for payment.

(3) The over-utilization of ionizing radiation in the re-X-ray of a patient. The acceptable guidelines for re-X-ray are:

a. When fractures are evident;

b. When bone pathologies are under evaluation;

c. When soft tissue pathologies are under evaluation;

d. When there is reinjury;

e. When the original X-ray findings have revealed limitations of ranges and motion, re-X-ray may be done after clinical progress has revealed objective improvement, but not within 12 days and only limited views would be indicated.

(4) Any licensee's failure to use the words Chiropractic Physician, Chiropractor or the initials D.C. in conjunction with the use of his name in his capacity as a Chiropractor on all reports, statements of claim for services rendered and on all signs, letterheads, business cards, advertising, and any other items of identification.

(5) Violation of the Rules of Ethics of Advertising and Publicity.

(6) The allowance of any unlicensed person to practice chiropractic in the office of a licensed chiropractic. (1985, c. 760, s. 4.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Federowicz v. N.C. Bd. of Chiropractic Exam'rs (N.C. Ct. App. 2024).
Federowicz v. N.C. Bd. of Chiropractic Exam'rs (N.C. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 90-154.2 (5)], by publicly describing herself as a chiropractor “who specializes in maternal and pediatric care”, when she does not have the qualifications required by Rule 21 NCAC 10.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.