N.C. Gen. Stat. » Chapter 95
NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-111.1 (2026)

Short title and legislative purpose

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 95 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

 (a) This Article shall be known as the "Amusement Device Safety Act of North Carolina".

 (b) The General Assembly finds that although most amusement devices are free from defect and operated in a safe manner, those which are not impose a substantial probability of serious and preventable injury to the public. Protection of the public from exposure to such unsafe conditions and the prevention of injuries is in the best interest and welfare of the people of the State.

 (c) It is the intent of this Article that amusement devices shall be designed, constructed, assembled or disassembled, maintained, and operated so as to prevent injuries. (1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 990, s. 2.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1992–2007 · leading case: Hunt v. North Carolina Dep't of Labor, 499 S.E.2d 747 (N.C. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hunt v. North Carolina Dep't of Labor, 499 S.E.2d 747 (N.C. 1998). · cites it 18× “This article begins with N.C.G.S. § 95-111.1, which provides in pertinent part: "It is the intent of this Article that amusement devices shall be designed, constructed, assembled or disassembled, maintained, and operated so as to prevent injuries.”
Multiple v. North Carolina Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 646 S.E.2d 356 (N.C. 2007). · cites it 3× “The Court concluded that the Amusement Device Safety Act, N.C.G.S. §§ 95-111.1 to -111.18, did not “impose a duty upon defendant to each go-kart customer.”
Zocco v. United States, Dep't of the Army, 791 F. Supp. 595 (E.D.N.C. 1992). · cites it 4× “” N.C.Gen.Stat. § 95-111.1 (emphasis added).”
Multiple v. North Carolina Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 626 S.E.2d 666 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “2d at 751 (emphasis added) (quoting N.C. Gen.Stat. § 95-111.1(b) (1989)). Stone and Hunt thus direct us to look at the specific statutes and regulations providing for any duty to inspect in order to determine whether the General Assembly intended the inspection to be for the…”
Hunt Ex Rel. Hasty v. North Carolina Dep't of Labor, 480 S.E.2d 413 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-111.1 (c) (1993). N.”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-111.1(b) — 2 cases
Hunt v. North Carolina Dep't of Labor, 499 S.E.2d 747 (N.C. 1998). “This article begins with N.C.G.S. § 95-111.1, which provides in pertinent part: "It is the intent of this Article that amusement devices shall be designed, constructed, assembled or disassembled, maintained, and operated so as to prevent injuries.”
Multiple v. North Carolina Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 626 S.E.2d 666 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006). “2d at 751 (emphasis added) (quoting N.C. Gen.Stat. § 95-111.1(b) (1989)). Stone and Hunt thus direct us to look at the specific statutes and regulations providing for any duty to inspect in order to determine whether the General Assembly intended the inspection to be for the…”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-111.1(c) — 1 case
Hunt v. North Carolina Dep't of Labor, 499 S.E.2d 747 (N.C. 1998). “This article begins with N.C.G.S. § 95-111.1, which provides in pertinent part: "It is the intent of this Article that amusement devices shall be designed, constructed, assembled or disassembled, maintained, and operated so as to prevent injuries.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.