NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-230 (2026)

Purpose

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 95 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds that individuals should be protected from unreliable and inadequate examinations and screening for controlled substances. The General Assembly also finds that employers who test employees for controlled substances shall use reliable and minimally invasive examinations and screenings and be afforded the opportunity to select from a range of cost-effective and advanced drug testing technologies. The purpose of this Article is to establish procedural and other requirements for the administration of controlled substance examinations. (1991, c. 687, s. 1; 2001-487, s. 66(a).)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1998–2009 · leading case: Garner v. Rentenbach Constructors Inc., 515 S.E.2d 438 (N.C. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Garner v. Rentenbach Constructors Inc., 515 S.E.2d 438 (N.C. 1999). · cites it 9× “” N.C.G.S. § 95-230 (1993). Under North Carolina law, an employer or prospective employer “who requests or requires an examinee to submit to a controlled substance examination shall comply with the procedural requirements” of the Controlled Substance Examination Regulation.”

Garner v. Rentenbach Constructors Inc., 501 S.E.2d 83 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “” N.C.G.S. § 95-230 (1993). N.C. Gen. Stat.”

Jones v. Graham Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 677 S.E.2d 171 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-230 (2007). Accordingly, the General Assembly has established “procedural and other requirements for the administration of controlled substance examinations.”

Williams v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 527 F.3d 1135 (10th Cir. 2008). “; N.C. Gen.Stat. § 95-230 et seq.; Ohio Admin.”

Graham v. Beasley Enter., Inc., 180 F. Supp. 2d 760 (E.D.N.C. 2001). “” The plaintiff in this matter relies on § 74C-1 which applies the language in the statute in Garner to the licensing of polygraph examiners. The purpose of § 74C-1 is to “safeguard the public health and welfare” with respect to the licensure of private investigators in their…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.