North Dakota Century Code

N.D. Cent. Code § 12-59-15 (2026)

Breach of parole - Hearings - Order of recommitment

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ND-LEGndlegis.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. When it is alleged that a parolee has violated any of the terms or conditions of parole established by the parole board or by the department of corrections and rehabilitation, the director of the department of corrections and rehabilitation may issue a warrant for the arrest of the parolee.

2. Upon issuance of a warrant of arrest for a parole violation, the running of the time period of parole must be suspended until the parole board issues a final order under this section. The parolee is entitled to credit for time spent in physical custody from the time of arrest until the time the parole board issues a final order.

3. The parolee is entitled to a preliminary hearing, as promptly as is convenient after the arrest and reasonably near the place of the alleged violation or arrest, to determine whether there is probable cause to find that the parolee violated any of the terms and conditions of parole established by the board or by the department of corrections and rehabilitation.

4. The preliminary hearing must be conducted before the director of the department of corrections and rehabilitation or other hearing officer authorized by the director. The preliminary hearing must be conducted by a disinterested hearing officer not directly involved in the supervision of the parolee or by the person bringing the allegation of a parole violation.

5. If the hearing officer determines there is probable cause to find that the parolee has violated any of the terms and conditions of parole established by the board or by the department of corrections and rehabilitation, the board may redetermine the time remaining in the period of parole to reflect any portion of the period during which the parolee was not under supervision or not in the custody of law enforcement personnel in the state.

6. If the hearing officer determines there is probable cause to find that the parolee has violated any of the terms and conditions of parole established by the board or by the department of corrections and rehabilitation, the parolee must be returned to the physical custody of the department of corrections and rehabilitation, transferred to another correctional facility or the state hospital, or released from actual custody pursuant to such terms and conditions as may be established by the parole board or the department of corrections and rehabilitation, pending a final revocation hearing before the parole board. If the board determines at the final revocation hearing that the parolee has violated any of the terms and conditions of parole established by the board or by the department of corrections and rehabilitation, the board may order the parolee be recommitted to the physical custody of the department of corrections and rehabilitation to serve all or part of the remaining time of the sentence that has not been served in custody.

7. At any hearing pursuant to this section a record must be made and the parolee shall have:

a. Written notice of the purpose of the hearing and the alleged violations.

b. The opportunity to be heard in person and present witnesses and documentary evidence.

c. The opportunity to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, unless the hearing officer determines that confrontation would create a risk of harm to the witness.

d. A written statement as to the reasons for the decision.

8. If the board determines the parolee has absconded, as defined in section 12.1-01-04, from supervision, the board may order the parolee to pay the costs of being returned to the board. Moneys recovered under this subsection must be remitted to the department of corrections and rehabilitation.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1968–2020 · leading case: John v. State, 160 N.W.2d 37 (N.D. 1968).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

John v. State, 160 N.W.2d 37 (N.D. 1968). · cites it 5× “A full hearing is the “due process” to which the petitioner is entitled by virtue of our statute.”

State v. Powley, 2020 ND 124 (N.D. 2020). · cites it 7× “The district court additionally found the conditions of Powley’s parole remained in effect while he was incarcerated under N.D.C.C. § 12-59-15. II Our standard for reviewing a district court’s decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress evidence is well established: A trial…”

Joseph Menechino v. Russell G. Oswald, as Chairman of the New York State Bd. of Parole, New Yorkstate Bd. of Parole, 430 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1970). “1968), interpreting N.D.Cent.Code § 12-59-15 (1963 Supp.). Others allow the Board to decide the matter, giving it the power to decline to hear counsel.”

— N.D. Cent. Code § 12-59-15(2) — 1 case

State v. Powley, 2020 ND 124 (N.D. 2020). “The district court additionally found the conditions of Powley’s parole remained in effect while he was incarcerated under N.D.C.C. § 12-59-15. II Our standard for reviewing a district court’s decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress evidence is well established: A trial…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.