Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1127.06 (2026)

Violation of superintendent of financial institutions order

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effective:

January 1, 1997

Latest Legislation:

House Bill 538 - 121st General Assembly

PDF:

Download Authenticated PDF

No person subject to an order issued by the superintendent of financial institutions under section 1121.33 or 1121.34 of the Revised Code shall knowingly participate, directly or indirectly, in any manner, including by engaging in an activity specifically prohibited in the order, in the conduct of the affairs of any bank or trust company.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1977–2008 · leading case: Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. v. Appeals Court, 362 N.E.2d 1189 (Mass. 1977).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. v. Appeals Court, 362 N.E.2d 1189 (Mass. 1977). “Banking Law §41 (McKinney 1971); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1127.06 (Baldwin 1975).”

City of Whitehall v. Khoury, 07ap-711 (3-25-2008), 2008 Ohio 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “06 shall be considered a nonconforming sign unless specifically exempted in Section 1127.06(b)(3)." Therefore, as further noted by appellee, Whitehall City Code Section 1127.”

— Ohio Rev. Code § 1127.06(b)(3) — 1 case

City of Whitehall v. Khoury, 07ap-711 (3-25-2008), 2008 Ohio 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008). “06 shall be considered a nonconforming sign unless specifically exempted in Section 1127.06(b)(3)." Therefore, as further noted by appellee, Whitehall City Code Section 1127.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.