(A) Except as provided in sections 126.301 and 1302.98 of the Revised Code, an action upon a contract not in writing, express or implied, shall be brought within four years after the cause of action accrued.
(B) An action upon a liability created by statute other than a forfeiture or penalty shall be brought within six years after the cause of action accrued.
(C) Except as provided in sections 1303.16, 1345.10, and 2305.04 of the Revised Code, and notwithstanding divisions (A) and (B) of this section, section 1302.98, and division (B) of section 2305.03 of the Revised Code, an action arising out of a consumer transaction incurred primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, based upon any contract, agreement, obligation, liability, or promise, express or implied, including an account stated, whether or not reduced to writing or signed by the party to be charged by that transaction, shall be commenced within six years after the cause of action accrued. For purposes of this division, a cause of action accrues thirty calendar days after the date of the last charge or payment by, or on behalf of, the consumer, whichever is later.
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Comp. v. McKinley, 2011 Ohio 4432 (Ohio 2011). · cites it 18ד931(G) to recover its subrogation interest is a claim “upon a liability created by statute” and is therefore subject to the six-year statute of limitations of R.C. 2305.07. (No. 2010-0720—Submitted March 2, 2011—Decided September 7, 2011.”
McAuliffe v. W. States Imp. Co., 651 N.E.2d 957 (Ohio 1995). · cites it 15ד73 is “an action * * * upon a liability created by statute” and therefore governed by the six-year limitations period provided in former R.C. 2305.07, 2 which stated: “Except as provided in section 1302.”
Harris v. Cunix, 2022 Ohio 839 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 10דOn September 18, 2020, appellant filed a response, arguing that the six-year statute of limitations in R.C. 2305.07 governed her claim. On September 25, 2020, appellee filed a reply reiterating his claim that the one-year statute of limitations in R.”
Desai v. Franklin, 895 N.E.2d 875 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 8ד{¶ 11} In his first assignment of error, Franklin argues that the trial court erred in denying his JNOV on Desai’s unjust-enrichment claim.”
Meyer v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 2009 Ohio 2463 (Ohio 2009). · cites it 6ד99 states no limitations period, he should be subject to the six-year statute of limitations of R.C. 2305.07. This court rejected that argument, holding at the syllabus that “[a]ny age discrimination claim, premised on a violation described in R.”
Steven Operating, Inc. v. Home State Sav., 105 F.R.D. 7 (S.D. Ohio 1984). · cites it 17דThe Horowitz Defendants, in support of their Motion to Amend the Cross-Claim, argue for the applicability of the six year statute of limitations for “a liability founded upon statute” set forth in Revised Code § 2305.07. This Court finds the counter argument of Home to be…”
Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp., 465 N.E.2d 1298 (Ohio 1984). · cites it 3דII The second issue presented is whether appellants pleaded in count two of their complaint an action in contract or quasi-contract so as to invoke the six-year statute of limitations of R.C. 2305.07. 2 For the reasons that follow, this court holds that appellants’ complaint…”
Sanchez v. Overmyer, 845 F. Supp. 1178 (N.D. Ohio 1993). · cites it 14דOhio Rev.Code § 2305.07 provides that: “an action upon a contract not in writing, express or implied, or upon a liability created by statute other than a forfeiture or penalty, shall be brought within six years after the cause thereof accrued.”
Harris v. Cunix, 2022 Ohio 839 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “On September 18, 2020, appellant filed a response, arguing that the six-year statute of limitations in R.C. 2305.07 governed her claim. On September 25, 2020, appellee filed a reply reiterating his claim that the one-year statute of limitations in R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.