Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2505 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02 (2026)

Final orders

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
April 9, 2025
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 237 (GA 135), House Bill 301 (GA 135)
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) As used in this section:

(1) "Substantial right" means a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.

(2) "Special proceeding" means an action or proceeding that is specially created by statute and that prior to 1853 was not denoted as an action at law or a suit in equity.

(3) "Provisional remedy" means a proceeding ancillary to an action, including, but not limited to, a proceeding for a preliminary injunction, attachment, discovery of privileged matter, suppression of evidence, a prima-facie showing pursuant to section 2307.85 or 2307.86 of the Revised Code, a prima-facie showing pursuant to section 2307.92 of the Revised Code, or a finding made pursuant to division (A)(3) of section 2307.93 of the Revised Code.

(B) An order is a final order that may be reviewed, affirmed, modified, or reversed, with or without retrial, when it is one of the following:

(1) An order that affects a substantial right in an action that in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment;

(2) An order that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding or upon a summary application in an action after judgment;

(3) An order that vacates or sets aside a judgment or grants a new trial;

(4) An order that grants or denies a provisional remedy and to which both of the following apply:

(a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party with respect to the provisional remedy.

(b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and parties in the action.

(5) An order that determines that an action may or may not be maintained as a class action;

(6) An order determining the constitutionality of any changes to the Revised Code made by Am. Sub. S.B. 281 of the 124th general assembly, including the amendment of sections 1751.67, 2117.06, 2305.11, 2305.15, 2305.234, 2317.02, 2317.54, 2323.56, 2711.21, 2711.22, 2711.23, 2711.24, 2743.02, 2743.43, 2919.16, 3923.63, 3923.64, 4705.15, and 5111.018 (renumbered as 5164.07 by H.B. 59 of the 130th general assembly), and the enactment of sections 2305.113, 2323.41, 2323.43, and 2323.55 of the Revised Code or any changes made by Sub. S.B. 80 of the 125th general assembly, including the amendment of sections 2125.02, 2305.10, 2305.131, 2315.18, 2315.19, and 2315.21 of the Revised Code;

(7) An order in an appropriation proceeding that may be appealed pursuant to division (B)(3) of section 163.09 of the Revised Code;

(8) An order restraining or restricting enforcement, whether on a temporary, preliminary, or permanent basis, in whole or in part, facially or as applied, of any state statute or regulation, including, but not limited to, orders in the form of injunctions, declaratory judgments, or writs ;

(9) An order that denies a motion for expedited relief pursuant to section 2747.04 of the Revised Code.

(C) When a court issues an order that vacates or sets aside a judgment or grants a new trial, the court, upon the request of either party, shall state in the order the grounds upon which the new trial is granted or the judgment vacated or set aside.

(D) This section applies to and governs any action, including an appeal, that is pending in any court on July 22, 1998, and all claims filed or actions commenced on or after July 22, 1998, notwithstanding any provision of any prior statute or rule of law of this state.

The Legislative Service Commission presents the text of this section as a composite of the section as amended by multiple acts of the General Assembly. This presentation recognizes the principle stated in R.C. 1.52(B) that amendments are to be harmonized if reasonably capable of simultaneous operation.

Last updated January 22, 2025 at 4:00 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2,577 cases (616 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case: Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2417 (Ohio 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2417 (Ohio 2018). · cites it 79× “02(A)(1) defines “substantial right” as “a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.” Carol argues that the trial court’s order violates her “right to procedural…”
In Re Grand Jury Proceeding of John Doe, 2016 Ohio 8001 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 92× “Which Statutes Apply? {¶ 7} The statute that discusses final orders is R.C. 2505.02. It begins by defining “substantial right,” “special proceeding,” and “provisional remedy.”
State v. Muncie, 746 N.E.2d 1092 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 58× “The court of appeals dismissed appellant’s appeal from that order, deciding that it was not final and appealable under R.C. 2505.02. Because we hold that the trial court’s forced medication order was indeed a “final order” under R.”
Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8000 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 37× “We later ordered the parties to show cause why the matter should not have been dismissed for lack of a final, appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. Smith v. Chen, 141 Ohio St.”
State v. Muncie, 2001 Ohio 93 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 62× “(R.C. 2505.02[A][3], construed.) 2. When a trial court orders an incompetent defendant to be forcibly medicated with psychotropic drugs in an effort to restore the defendant to competency, that order is final and appealable.”
State v. Lester, 2011 Ohio 5204 (Ohio 2011). · cites it 19× “A judgment of conviction is a final order subject to appeal under R.C. 2505.02 when it sets forth (1) the fact of the conviction, (2) the sentence, (3) the judge’s signature, and (4) the time stamp indicating the entry upon the journal by the clerk.”
State v. Craig (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 455 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 22× “{¶ 10} Although our Constitution and several statutory provisions use the language “judgments or final orders” when describing appellate-court jurisdiction, Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section 3(B)(2); R.”
Sinnott v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., 876 N.E.2d 1217 (Ohio 2007). · cites it 24× “{¶ 4} Appellants filed an appeal with the Eighth District Court of Appeals that was dismissed as premature pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. Sinnott v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. (July 12, 2006), 8th Dist.”
Stevens v. Ackman, 91 Ohio St. 3d 182 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 25× “This court held in Polikoff , at the syllabus, that “[o]rders that are entered in actions that were recognized at common law or in equity and were not specially created by statute are not orders entered in special proceedings pursuant to R.C. 2505.02.” In Polikoff, 67 Ohio St.3d…”
State v. Anderson, 2014 Ohio 542 (Ohio 2014). · cites it 22× “The court of appeals rejected its claim, “finding that in this particular situation where there have been multiple mistrials, the order appealed is a final, appealable order as defined by R.C. 2505.02.” 2012-Ohio-4390 , 2012 WL 4391545 , at ¶ 1.”
In re C.B., 2011 Ohio 2899 (Ohio 2011). · cites it 27× “2010-0180 — Submitted February 16, 2011 — Decided June 22, 2011.”
Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ., 541 N.E.2d 64 (Ohio 1989). · cites it 17× “In this case, we will address whether the September 4, 1987 and October 6, 1987 orders are final, appealable orders pursuant to R.C. 2505.02 and Civ. R. 54(B). R.C. 2505.”
Show all 2,577 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(2) — 1 case
State v. Lowe, 2019 Ohio 5183 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(3) — 2 cases
State v. Lowe, 2011 Ohio 3355 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Lowe, 2019 Ohio 5183 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(4) — 3 cases
Helbling v. Ward, 2014 Ohio 1513 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., Co., 2024 Ohio 3187 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Davis v. Boone, 2011 Ohio 6442 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(4)(b) — 1 case
State v. Ricciardi, 733 N.E.2d 291 (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A) — 17 cases
In Re: The S Child., 2018 Ohio 2961 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
DeVore v. Black (Slip Opinion), 2021 Ohio 3153 (Ohio 2021).
State v. Myers, 2022 Ohio 991 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Awkal, 2012 Ohio 3970 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Vetter v. Twesigye, 824 N.E.2d 581 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A)(1) — 259 cases
Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2417 (Ohio 2018). “02(A)(1) defines “substantial right” as “a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.” Carol argues that the trial court’s order violates her “right to procedural…”
State v. Lester, 2011 Ohio 5204 (Ohio 2011). “A judgment of conviction is a final order subject to appeal under R.C. 2505.02 when it sets forth (1) the fact of the conviction, (2) the sentence, (3) the judge’s signature, and (4) the time stamp indicating the entry upon the journal by the clerk.”
Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame, 112 Ohio St. 3d 514 (Ohio 2007).
Crown Servs., Inc. v. Miami Valley Paper Tube Co. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 4409 (Ohio 2020).
In re S Child., 2018 Ohio 5010 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A)(2) — 139 cases
Stevens v. Ackman, 91 Ohio St. 3d 182 (Ohio 2001). “This court held in Polikoff , at the syllabus, that “[o]rders that are entered in actions that were recognized at common law or in equity and were not specially created by statute are not orders entered in special proceedings pursuant to R.C. 2505.02.” In Polikoff, 67 Ohio St.3d…”
Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2417 (Ohio 2018). “02(A)(1) defines “substantial right” as “a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.” Carol argues that the trial court’s order violates her “right to procedural…”
In Re Est. of Geanangel, 761 N.E.2d 1235 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
Stevens v. Ackman, 2001 Ohio 249 (Ohio 2001).
Myers v. City of Toledo, 852 N.E.2d 1176 (Ohio 2006).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A)(3) — 232 cases
In Re Grand Jury Proceeding of John Doe, 2016 Ohio 8001 (Ohio 2016). “Which Statutes Apply? {¶ 7} The statute that discusses final orders is R.C. 2505.02. It begins by defining “substantial right,” “special proceeding,” and “provisional remedy.”
State v. Muncie, 746 N.E.2d 1092 (Ohio 2001). “The court of appeals dismissed appellant’s appeal from that order, deciding that it was not final and appealable under R.C. 2505.02. Because we hold that the trial court’s forced medication order was indeed a “final order” under R.”
State v. Muncie, 2001 Ohio 93 (Ohio 2001). “(R.C. 2505.02[A][3], construed.) 2. When a trial court orders an incompetent defendant to be forcibly medicated with psychotropic drugs in an effort to restore the defendant to competency, that order is final and appealable.”
State v. Anderson, 2014 Ohio 542 (Ohio 2014). “The court of appeals rejected its claim, “finding that in this particular situation where there have been multiple mistrials, the order appealed is a final, appealable order as defined by R.C. 2505.02.” 2012-Ohio-4390 , 2012 WL 4391545 , at ¶ 1.”
Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame, 112 Ohio St. 3d 514 (Ohio 2007).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A)(3)(a) — 1 case
In re Special Docket No. 73958, 115 Ohio St. 3d 425 (Ohio 2007).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A)(3)(b) — 1 case
State v. Verbanac, 2022 Ohio 3743 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A)(4) — 4 cases
Empower Aviation, L.L.C. v. Butler Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 924 N.E.2d 862 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
Kraus v. Maurer, 740 N.E.2d 722 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000).
GrafTech Internatl. Ltd. v. Pac. Emps. Ins. Co., 2016 Ohio 1377 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Am. Env't Grp., Ltd. v. H.M. Miller Constr. Co., 2014 Ohio 4681 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A)(4)(a) — 1 case
In re E.H., 2016 Ohio 1186 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(A)(4)(b) — 1 case
In re E.H., 2016 Ohio 1186 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B) — 576 cases
Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2417 (Ohio 2018). “02(A)(1) defines “substantial right” as “a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.” Carol argues that the trial court’s order violates her “right to procedural…”
State v. Craig (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 455 (Ohio 2020). “{¶ 10} Although our Constitution and several statutory provisions use the language “judgments or final orders” when describing appellate-court jurisdiction, Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section 3(B)(2); R.”
State v. Muncie, 746 N.E.2d 1092 (Ohio 2001). “The court of appeals dismissed appellant’s appeal from that order, deciding that it was not final and appealable under R.C. 2505.02. Because we hold that the trial court’s forced medication order was indeed a “final order” under R.”
Stevens v. Ackman, 91 Ohio St. 3d 182 (Ohio 2001). “This court held in Polikoff , at the syllabus, that “[o]rders that are entered in actions that were recognized at common law or in equity and were not specially created by statute are not orders entered in special proceedings pursuant to R.C. 2505.02.” In Polikoff, 67 Ohio St.3d…”
Redding v. United States Parachute Assn., Inc., 2023 Ohio 884 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(1) — 472 cases
State v. Craig (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 455 (Ohio 2020). “{¶ 10} Although our Constitution and several statutory provisions use the language “judgments or final orders” when describing appellate-court jurisdiction, Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section 3(B)(2); R.”
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 1984 (Ohio 2014).
In re S Child., 2018 Ohio 5010 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re C.B., 2011 Ohio 2899 (Ohio 2011). “2010-0180 — Submitted February 16, 2011 — Decided June 22, 2011.”
Crown Servs., Inc. v. Miami Valley Paper Tube Co. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 4409 (Ohio 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(1)(4)(B) — 1 case
Woods v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr., 2018 Ohio 603 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(2) — 332 cases
Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2417 (Ohio 2018). “02(A)(1) defines “substantial right” as “a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.” Carol argues that the trial court’s order violates her “right to procedural…”
Stevens v. Ackman, 91 Ohio St. 3d 182 (Ohio 2001). “This court held in Polikoff , at the syllabus, that “[o]rders that are entered in actions that were recognized at common law or in equity and were not specially created by statute are not orders entered in special proceedings pursuant to R.C. 2505.02.” In Polikoff, 67 Ohio St.3d…”
Wilhelm-Kissinger v. Kissinger, 2011 Ohio 2317 (Ohio 2011).
In re S Child., 2018 Ohio 5010 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Walburn v. Dunlap, 2009 Ohio 1221 (Ohio 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(3) — 80 cases
VIL Laser Sys., L.L.C. v. Shiloh Indus., Inc., 119 Ohio St. 3d 354 (Ohio 2008).
In re A.J.S., 897 N.E.2d 629 (Ohio 2008).
Gasper v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2019 Ohio 1150 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Welly v. Welly, 2015 Ohio 4804 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
Superior Off. Space, L.L.C. v. Carpenter, 2023 Ohio 967 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(4) — 322 cases
In Re Grand Jury Proceeding of John Doe, 2016 Ohio 8001 (Ohio 2016). “Which Statutes Apply? {¶ 7} The statute that discusses final orders is R.C. 2505.02. It begins by defining “substantial right,” “special proceeding,” and “provisional remedy.”
State v. Muncie, 746 N.E.2d 1092 (Ohio 2001). “The court of appeals dismissed appellant’s appeal from that order, deciding that it was not final and appealable under R.C. 2505.02. Because we hold that the trial court’s forced medication order was indeed a “final order” under R.”
Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2417 (Ohio 2018). “02(A)(1) defines “substantial right” as “a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.” Carol argues that the trial court’s order violates her “right to procedural…”
State v. Muncie, 2001 Ohio 93 (Ohio 2001). “(R.C. 2505.02[A][3], construed.) 2. When a trial court orders an incompetent defendant to be forcibly medicated with psychotropic drugs in an effort to restore the defendant to competency, that order is final and appealable.”
State ex rel. Thomas v. McGinty (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5452 (Ohio 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(4)(1) — 1 case
McGuire v. Zarla, 2012 Ohio 2976 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(4)(a) — 90 cases
Sinnott v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., 876 N.E.2d 1217 (Ohio 2007). “{¶ 4} Appellants filed an appeal with the Eighth District Court of Appeals that was dismissed as premature pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. Sinnott v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. (July 12, 2006), 8th Dist.”
In Re Grand Jury Proceeding of John Doe, 2016 Ohio 8001 (Ohio 2016). “Which Statutes Apply? {¶ 7} The statute that discusses final orders is R.C. 2505.02. It begins by defining “substantial right,” “special proceeding,” and “provisional remedy.”
State v. Muncie, 746 N.E.2d 1092 (Ohio 2001). “The court of appeals dismissed appellant’s appeal from that order, deciding that it was not final and appealable under R.C. 2505.02. Because we hold that the trial court’s forced medication order was indeed a “final order” under R.”
Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8000 (Ohio 2016). “We later ordered the parties to show cause why the matter should not have been dismissed for lack of a final, appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. Smith v. Chen, 141 Ohio St.”
Youngstown City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State, 2017 Ohio 555 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(4)(b) — 105 cases
Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8000 (Ohio 2016). “We later ordered the parties to show cause why the matter should not have been dismissed for lack of a final, appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. Smith v. Chen, 141 Ohio St.”
In re Special Grand Jury Investigation, 2018 Ohio 760 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Grand Jury Proceeding of John Doe, 2016 Ohio 8001 (Ohio 2016). “Which Statutes Apply? {¶ 7} The statute that discusses final orders is R.C. 2505.02. It begins by defining “substantial right,” “special proceeding,” and “provisional remedy.”
DMS Constr. Ents., L.L.C. v. Homick, 2020 Ohio 4919 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
Sinnott v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., 876 N.E.2d 1217 (Ohio 2007). “{¶ 4} Appellants filed an appeal with the Eighth District Court of Appeals that was dismissed as premature pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. Sinnott v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. (July 12, 2006), 8th Dist.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(4)(t) — 1 case
Nester v. Lima Mem'l Hosp., 745 N.E.2d 1153 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(5) — 37 cases
Lycan v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 422 (Ohio 2016).
Oakley v. Ohio State Univ. Wexner Med. Ctr., 2019 Ohio 3557 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Lycan v. Cleveland, 2022 Ohio 4676 (Ohio 2022).
Lycan v. Cleveland, 2019 Ohio 3510 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Smith v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 764 (Ohio 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(6) — 12 cases
Young v. Durrani, 2016 Ohio 5526 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2016 Ohio 513 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Superior Off. Space, L.L.C. v. Carpenter, 2023 Ohio 967 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
State v. Powell, 2019 Ohio 4286 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Paganini v. Cataract Eye Ctr. of Cleveland, 2025 Ohio 275 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(7) — 10 cases
State ex rel. Bohlen v. Halliday (Slip Opinion), 2021 Ohio 194 (Ohio 2021).
State ex rel. Ohio History Connection v. Moundbuilders Country Club Co., 2020 Ohio 276 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
Mill Creek Metro. Dist. Bd. of Commrs. v. Less, 2022 Ohio 1289 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Superior Off. Space, L.L.C. v. Carpenter, 2023 Ohio 967 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
State v. Powell, 2019 Ohio 4286 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(8) — 3 cases
Gemmell v. Evergreen Site Holdings, Inc., 2025 Ohio 2258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
Newman v. Durrani, 2025 Ohio 5329 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
Doe v. Columbus (Ohio 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(9) — 1 case
Gemmell v. Evergreen Site Holdings, Inc., 2025 Ohio 2258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(Ip) — 1 case
State v. Muncie, 746 N.E.2d 1092 (Ohio 2001). “The court of appeals dismissed appellant’s appeal from that order, deciding that it was not final and appealable under R.C. 2505.02. Because we hold that the trial court’s forced medication order was indeed a “final order” under R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(a) — 1 case
Helbling v. Ward, 2014 Ohio 1513 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(B)(l) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Cook v. Seneca Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 889 N.E.2d 153 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(C) — 1 case
In re Z.L., 2024 Ohio 2913 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.02(D) — 3 cases
Haynes v. City of Franklin, 732 N.E.2d 1060 (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).
Chamberlain v. AK Steel Corp., 696 N.E.2d 569 (Ohio 1998).
Chamberlain v. AK Steel Corp., 1998 Ohio 401 (Ohio 1998).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.