In connection with an appeal of a final order, judgment, or decree of a court, assignments of error may be filed by an appellee who does not appeal, which assignments shall be passed upon by a reviewing court before the final order, judgment, or decree is reversed in whole or in part. The time within which assignments of error by an appellee may be filed shall be fixed by rule of court.
Duracote Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 443 N.E.2d 184 (Ohio 1983). · cites it 6דR.C. 2505.22 provides, in part: “Assignments of error may be filed on behalf of an appellee which shall be passed upon by a reviewing court before a judgment or order is reversed in whole or in part.”
Pang v. Minch, 559 N.E.2d 1313 (Ohio 1990). · cites it 2דThe better method for attaining this goal would be employment of the procedure authorized by R.C. 2505.22. This section provides as follows: “In connection with an appeal of a final order, judgment, or decree of a court, assignments of error may be filed by an appellee who does…”
McCarthy v. Sterling Chems., Inc., 2012-Ohio-5211. · cites it 9דPlaintiffs did not file an R.C. 2505.22 assignment of error based on the “ACF argument” to prevent reversal in the first appeal.”
Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 861 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 2006). “{¶ 30} R.C. 2505.22 permits the filing of assignments of error by an appellee who has not appealed.”
Rhodus v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 588 N.E.2d 864 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1990). “Pursuant to R.C. 2505.22, defendant has filed a cross-assignment of error in the interest of preventing reversal.”
Lykins v. Fun Spot Trampolines, 874 N.E.2d 811 (Ohio Ct. App. 12th Dist. 2007). · cites it 2דIn addition, the Thompsons raise a single cross-assignment of error pursuant to R.C. 2505.22. {¶ 8} Appellant’s Assignment of Error No.”
Lyon Revocable Trust v. Berry, 2025-Ohio-425, 263 N.E.3d 1085. · cites it 6ד22 {¶29} The defendants raise a defensive cross-assignment of error under R.C. 2505.22. “‘An appellee who has not filed a notice of appeal (cross-appeal) can file cross-assignments of error under R.”
Helton v. Scioto Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 703 N.E.2d 841 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1997). “3(C) and R.C. 2505.22, in support of the summary judgment, the appellee asserts one cross-assignment of error, which states: “The court should have granted summary judgment in that the evidence was clear that the county acted reasonably.”
Loewenstine v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 455 N.E.2d 3 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1982). · cites it 5ד4[A]), R.C. 2505.22 requires us to pass upon its assignment of error before the judgment is reversed.”
Est. of Hand, 2016-Ohio-7437. · cites it 2ד{¶ 40} In an effort to defend the probate court's judgment denying appellant's application to admit the Love Letter Will to probate, Hand raises the following cross- assignment of error pursuant to R.C. 2505.22 and App.R. 3(C)(2): {¶ 41} THE PROBATE COURT'S ORDER DENYING…”
Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Maloof Props., Ltd., 2012-Ohio-470, 968 N.E.2d 602. · cites it 2דThe remaining assignment of error and Ohio National Life’s assignments of error submitted pursuant to R.C. 2505.22, 1 dispute the validity of the charging lien and are moot.”
Morgan v. City of Cincinnati, 496 N.E.2d 468 (Ohio 1986). · cites it 2דAppellee renews its argument to this court on authority of R.C. 2505.22, which authorizes an appellee who has not filed an appeal nonetheless to file assignments of error in the interest of preventing a reversal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.