"Dismemberment abortion" means, with the purpose of causing the death of an unborn child, to dismember a living unborn child and extract the unborn child one piece at a time from the uterus through use of clamps, grasping forceps, tongs, scissors, or similar instruments that, through the convergence of two rigid levers, slice, crush, or grasp a portion of the unborn child's body to cut or rip it off. "Dismemberment abortion" does not include a procedure performed after the death of the unborn child to extract any remaining parts of the unborn child.
"Serious risk of the substantial and irreversible i mpairment of a major bodily function" has the same meaning as in section 2919.151 of the Revised Code.
"Unborn child" has the same meaning as in section 2919.16 of the Revised Code.
(B) No person shall knowingly perform or attempt to perform a dismemberment abortion when the dismemberment abortion is not necessary, in reasonable medical judgment, to preserve the life or physical health of the mother as a result of the mother's life or physical health being endangered by a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.
(C) Whoever violates division (B) of this section is guilty of dismemberment feticide, a felony of the fourth degree.
(D) None of the following are guilty of committing, attempting to commit, complicity in the commission of, or conspiracy in the commission of a violation of division (B) of this section:
(1) A pregnant woman upon whom a dismemberment abortion is performed in violation of division (B) of this section;
(2) An individual who is employed by the person who violates division (B) of this section and who acts at the direction of the person who violates division (B) of this section;
(3) A pharmacist or other individual who fills a p rescription or provides instruments or materials used in violating division (B) of this section.
(E) This section does not prohibit the suction curettage procedure of abortion or the suction aspiration procedure of abortion.
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Voinovich, 911 F. Supp. 1051 (S.D. Ohio 1995). · cites it 16דO.R.C. § 2919.15(A). Plaintiff argues that this definition is unconstitutionally vague, because it does not adequately distinguish the D & X procedure from a different procedure known as the Dilation and Evacuation (“D & E”) procedure.”
Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). · cites it 2ד" Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2919.15 (A) (1997).”
State v. Motz, 2020 Ohio 4356 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “15(B)(1)(c)(i) and (ii) places a limitation on the length of the prison term that can be imposed for a technical violation of an offender's community control if the underlying offense was a felony of the fourth or fifth degree.”
State v. Parker, 2020 Ohio 4607 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “” The complaint charged Parker with domestic violence in violation of R.C. 2919.15(A), a fourth-degree felony. {¶ 8} On April 16, 2018, Parker was arrested and held in jail in lieu of bail— where he remained until his trial in the underlying case (i.”
Planned Parenthood of Cent. New Jersey v. Verniero, 41 F. Supp. 2d 478 (D.N.J. 1998). “, Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.15(A) (excluding suction curettage and suction aspiration abortion procedures specifically from definition of prohibited conduct).”
State v. Bey, 2019 Ohio 1884 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “16(A); domestic violence (renumbered Count 7), in violation of R.C. 2919.15(B); and assault (renumbered Count 8), in violation of R.”
Planned Parenthood Sw. Ohio Region v. Yost, 375 F. Supp. 3d 848 (2019). · cites it 19ד145 or the Act), 132nd General Assembly (Ohio 2018) (codified at Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15 ) was signed into law on December 21, 2018.”
Hankinson v. Cooper, 2022 Ohio 1896 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “31, for purposes of the offense of domestic violence in violation of R.C. 2919.15(A), (B), and (C), the phrase "physical harm to persons" is defined by R.”
Northland Fam. Plan. Clinic, Inc. v. Cox, 394 F. Supp. 2d 978 (E.D. Mich. 2005). “The language in the Michigan statute requires the health exception only when a procedure is necessary to “avert an imminent threat to the physical health of the mother, and any harm to the perinate was incidental to treating the mother and not a known or intended result of the…”
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Voinovich, 130 F.3d 187 (6th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2ד” Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.15(A). The definition further provides that the D & X procedure “does not include either the suction curettage procedure of abortion or the suction aspiration procedure of abortion.”
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Voinovich, 911 F. Supp. 1051 (S.D. Ohio 1995). “O.R.C. § 2919.15(A). Plaintiff argues that this definition is unconstitutionally vague, because it does not adequately distinguish the D & X procedure from a different procedure known as the Dilation and Evacuation (“D & E”) procedure.”
State v. Parker, 2020 Ohio 4607 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “” The complaint charged Parker with domestic violence in violation of R.C. 2919.15(A), a fourth-degree felony. {¶ 8} On April 16, 2018, Parker was arrested and held in jail in lieu of bail— where he remained until his trial in the underlying case (i.”
Planned Parenthood of Cent. New Jersey v. Verniero, 41 F. Supp. 2d 478 (D.N.J. 1998). “, Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.15(A) (excluding suction curettage and suction aspiration abortion procedures specifically from definition of prohibited conduct).”
Hankinson v. Cooper, 2022 Ohio 1896 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “31, for purposes of the offense of domestic violence in violation of R.C. 2919.15(A), (B), and (C), the phrase "physical harm to persons" is defined by R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15(A)(1) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Sw. Ohio Region v. Yost, 375 F. Supp. 3d 848 (2019). “145 or the Act), 132nd General Assembly (Ohio 2018) (codified at Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15 ) was signed into law on December 21, 2018.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15(B) — 7 cases
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Voinovich, 911 F. Supp. 1051 (S.D. Ohio 1995). “O.R.C. § 2919.15(A). Plaintiff argues that this definition is unconstitutionally vague, because it does not adequately distinguish the D & X procedure from a different procedure known as the Dilation and Evacuation (“D & E”) procedure.”
State v. Bey, 2019 Ohio 1884 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “16(A); domestic violence (renumbered Count 7), in violation of R.C. 2919.15(B); and assault (renumbered Count 8), in violation of R.”
Planned Parenthood Sw. Ohio Region v. Yost, 375 F. Supp. 3d 848 (2019). “145 or the Act), 132nd General Assembly (Ohio 2018) (codified at Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15 ) was signed into law on December 21, 2018.”
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Voinovich, 130 F.3d 187 (6th Cir. 1997). “” Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.15(A). The definition further provides that the D & X procedure “does not include either the suction curettage procedure of abortion or the suction aspiration procedure of abortion.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15(B)(1)(c)(ii) — 1 case
State v. Motz, 2020 Ohio 4356 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “15(B)(1)(c)(i) and (ii) places a limitation on the length of the prison term that can be imposed for a technical violation of an offender's community control if the underlying offense was a felony of the fourth or fifth degree.”
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Voinovich, 911 F. Supp. 1051 (S.D. Ohio 1995). “O.R.C. § 2919.15(A). Plaintiff argues that this definition is unconstitutionally vague, because it does not adequately distinguish the D & X procedure from a different procedure known as the Dilation and Evacuation (“D & E”) procedure.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15(D) — 1 case
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Voinovich, 911 F. Supp. 1051 (S.D. Ohio 1995). “O.R.C. § 2919.15(A). Plaintiff argues that this definition is unconstitutionally vague, because it does not adequately distinguish the D & X procedure from a different procedure known as the Dilation and Evacuation (“D & E”) procedure.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15(E) — 2 cases
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Voinovich, 911 F. Supp. 1051 (S.D. Ohio 1995). “O.R.C. § 2919.15(A). Plaintiff argues that this definition is unconstitutionally vague, because it does not adequately distinguish the D & X procedure from a different procedure known as the Dilation and Evacuation (“D & E”) procedure.”
Planned Parenthood Sw. Ohio Region v. Yost, 375 F. Supp. 3d 848 (2019). “145 or the Act), 132nd General Assembly (Ohio 2018) (codified at Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15 ) was signed into law on December 21, 2018.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.