Okla. Stat. » Title 10 — CHILDREN
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2 (2026)

Renumbered as § 7306-1.1 of this title by Laws 1995, c

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

352, § 199, eff. July 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47 cases, 1979–2001 · leading case: J. M. R. v. Moore, 610 P.2d 811 (Okla. Crim. App. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
J. M. R. v. Moore, 610 P.2d 811 (Okla. Crim. App. 1980). · cites it 14× “The authority for initiating proceedings against the petitioner in the District Court derived from 10 O.S.Supp. 1979, § 1104.2, effective October 1, 1979, (Sess.”
State Ex Rel. Coats v. Rakestraw, 610 P.2d 256 (Okla. Crim. App. 1980). · cites it 7× “[3] Probably, the Legislature reasoned that the application of 10 O.S.Supp. 1979, § 1104.2, would result in most if not all 16 or 17-year-old persons being tried in criminal court and incarcerated for substantial lengths of time to protect the public.”
Harris v. State, 777 P.2d 1359 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989). · cites it 7× “Nonetheless, in the instant case the appellant had been arrested and detained on a charge of First Degree Rape and First Degree Burglary and clearly fell under the provisions of 10 O.S.Supp. 1981, § 1104.2, and 21 O.S.Supp.”
State Ex Rel. Coats v. Johnson, 597 P.2d 328 (Okla. Crim. App. 1979). · cites it 8× “OPINION BRETT, Judge: On January 29, 1979, the respondent, Seventh Judicial District Judge, Sandra Johnson, declared 10 O.S.Supp. 1978, §§ 1104.2 and 1112(b), unconstitutional on the grounds (1) that the statutes deny equal protection of the law; (2) that Section 1112(b) creates…”
Williams v. State, 807 P.2d 271 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “1981 , § 791), pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1985, § 1104.2. Appellant's motion to be certified as a juvenile was denied by the District Court of Oklahoma County on December 16, 1986.”
Hain v. State, 852 P.2d 744 (Okla. Crim. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “To the extent that classification as a juvenile is denied, as it was here, then the admittedly young defendant is afforded all the constitutional protections against the arbitrary assessment of the death penalty as is any other defendant.”
Walker v. State, 803 S.W.2d 502 (Ark. 1991). · cites it 2× “There, the juvenile was charged as an adult with three counts of murder, and she sought certification as a child in accordance with 10 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 1104.2. Subsection A.”
Wright v. State, 2001 OK CR 19 (Okla. Crim. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “[6] ¶ 13 In his first proposition of error, Appellant claims the State's delay in filing first degree murder charges against him until he was twenty three years old [7] denied him his rights to be certified as a child under Oklahoma's reverse certification statute, 10 O.S.1991,…”
Douma v. State, 749 P.2d 1163 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). · cites it 3× “179, § 2, and is now codified as 10 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 1104.2. The 1985 amendment added subsection E making an order certifying a person as a child or denying the request for certification as a child pursuant to subsection D, a final order.”
State v. Bell, 785 P.2d 390 (Utah 1989). · cites it 2× “10 Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2 (1981). Under the Utah statute, by way of contrast, identically charged juveniles may be treated entirely differently and unequally.”
Stokes v. State, 738 P.2d 1364 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987). · cites it 3× “See 10 O.S.Supp.1986, § 1104.2. She claims the evidence at the preliminary hearing was only sufficient, if at all, for a charge of Robbery by Force and since that charge is not one of the ones enumerated in the reverse certification provisions of the code she should have been…”
W.D.C. v. State, 799 P.2d 142 (Okla. Crim. App. 1990). · cites it 3× “OPINION LANE, Vice Presiding Judge: Pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1988, § 1104.2 seventeen year old W.”
Show all 47 citing cases →
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2(A) — 15 cases
Harris v. State, 777 P.2d 1359 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989). “Nonetheless, in the instant case the appellant had been arrested and detained on a charge of First Degree Rape and First Degree Burglary and clearly fell under the provisions of 10 O.S.Supp. 1981, § 1104.2, and 21 O.S.Supp.”
Williams v. State, 807 P.2d 271 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “1981 , § 791), pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1985, § 1104.2. Appellant's motion to be certified as a juvenile was denied by the District Court of Oklahoma County on December 16, 1986.”
Tilley v. State, 1998 OK CR 43 (Okla. Crim. App. 1998).
A.T. v. State, 773 P.2d 755 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989).
Stokes v. State, 738 P.2d 1364 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987). “See 10 O.S.Supp.1986, § 1104.2. She claims the evidence at the preliminary hearing was only sufficient, if at all, for a charge of Robbery by Force and since that charge is not one of the ones enumerated in the reverse certification provisions of the code she should have been…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2(B) — 2 cases
H.W. v. State, 759 P.2d 214 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
HW v. State, 759 P.2d 214 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2(C) — 14 cases
Wright v. State, 2001 OK CR 19 (Okla. Crim. App. 2001). “[6] ¶ 13 In his first proposition of error, Appellant claims the State's delay in filing first degree murder charges against him until he was twenty three years old [7] denied him his rights to be certified as a child under Oklahoma's reverse certification statute, 10 O.S.1991,…”
Trolinger v. State, 736 P.2d 168 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987).
W.D.C. v. State, 799 P.2d 142 (Okla. Crim. App. 1990). “OPINION LANE, Vice Presiding Judge: Pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1988, § 1104.2 seventeen year old W.”
Highsaw v. State, 758 P.2d 336 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
State v. Woodward, 737 P.2d 569 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2(C)(1) — 1 case
G.E.D. v. State, 751 P.2d 755 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2(C)(2) — 1 case
G.E.D. v. State, 751 P.2d 755 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2(C)(3) — 2 cases
G.E.D. v. State, 751 P.2d 755 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
Armer v. State, 773 P.2d 757 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2(C)(4) — 1 case
G.E.D. v. State, 751 P.2d 755 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1104.2(E) — 1 case
Mooney v. State, 1999 OK CR 34 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.