Except as provided in Section 132 of this title or Section 163 of Title 51 of the Oklahoma Statutes: 1. Actions for the following causes shall be brought in the county in which the subject of the action is situated a. for the recovery of real property, or of any estate, or interest therein, or the determination in any form of any such right or interest, b. for the partition of real property, c. for the sale of real property under a mortgage, lien, or other encumbrance or charge, and d. to quiet title, to establish a trust in, remove a cloud on, set aside a conveyance of, or to enforce or set aside an agreement to convey real property; and 2. For all damages to land, crops, or improvements thereon, actions shall be brought in the county where the damage occurs. R.L. 1910, § 4671. Amended by Laws 1957, p. 78, § 2; Laws 1999, c. 293, § 2 eff. Nov. 1, 1999.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases, 1962–2019 · leading case:
Stevens v. Blevins, 890 P.2d 936 (Okla. 1995).
Stevens v. Blevins, 890 P.2d 936 (Okla. 1995).
· cites it 2× “See, Title 12 O.S.1991 §§ 131 et seq., which governs the proper venue of actions brought in Oklahoma.”
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Corr. v. Brock, 513 P.2d 1293 (Okla. 1973).
· cites it 2× “1971, § 133, in arguing that venue properly lies in Oklahoma County; whereas, plaintiffs in the Comanche County action argue that 12 O.S.1971, § 131, applies to place venue in Comanche County.”
State Ex Rel. Otjen v. Mayhue, 476 P.2d 317 (Okla. 1970).
· cites it 2× “The same consistency has not been true concerning civil code provisions relating to venue, 12 O.S.1961 § 131 et seq., particularly § 139, which executor insists should control.”
Morris v. Leverett, 434 P.2d 912 (Okla. 1967).
“12 O.S.1941 § 131, sub. (1).” In Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.”
Oklahoma City v. Whelan, 557 P.2d 879 (Okla. 1976).
· cites it 4× “Respondent contends that 12 O.S.1971 § 131 is the applicable and controlling statute, and that such statute requires that the action be brought where plaintiff’s land is located, since the land is the subject matter of plaintiff’s' action, because the statute requires that the…”
Brooks Hall Corp. v. Seay, 571 P.2d 462 (Okla. 1977).
“Plaintiffs contend venue is properly placed in Hughes County by reason of 12 O.S.1971, § 131, which states in pertinent part: “Actions for the following causes must be brought in the county in which the subject of the actions is situated .”
State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Dist. Court of Nowata Cnty., 519 P.2d 513 (Okla. 1974).
“The subject matter in this case is money paid under protest pursuant to an order entered by the Tax Commission in Oklahoma City, and now being held by the Tax Commission in its official depository clearing account with the State Treasurer pursuant to § 226(b).”
Pittman v. Compton, 277 F. Supp. 772 (N.D. Okla. 1968).
“This is the tenor of the Oklahoma venue statutes (12 O.S. § 131 et seq.) and one of the long-arm statutes (12 O.”
Fed. Land Bank of Wichita v. Burris, 790 P.2d 534 (Okla. 1990).
· cites it 2× “Although Section 483a does not use the word “jurisdiction,” the statute specifically refers to the laws of the state, and thereby makes foreclosure proceedings in .”
Bank of Wilson v. Hartman, 785 P.2d 338 (Okla. Civ. App. 1989).
· cites it 2× “12 O.S.1981 § 131 mandates an action foreclosing real property be brought in the county in which it is situated.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 131(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.