Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 158 (2026)
Several contracts taken as one
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Several contracts relating to the same matters, between the same parties, and made as parts of substantially one transaction, are to be taken together. R.L.1910, § 952.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1961–2024 · leading case: Frank v. Allstate Ins. Co., 727 P.2d 577 (Okla. 1986).
Frank v. Allstate Ins. Co., 727 P.2d 577 (Okla. 1986). “1981 § 158 [6] provides that even if there are several contracts relating to the same matters between the same parties which are made substantially one transaction, the contracts are to be construed together. The policy under consideration parrots § 3636the insurer agreed to…”
Mooneyham v. BRSI, LLC, 682 F. App'x 655 (10th Cir. 2017). “” Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 158 . See also Strickland v.”
In the Matter of the Est. of Carlson, 2016 OK 6 (Okla. 2016). “FOOTNOTES 1 See Title 15 O.S. 2011 § 158 ("Several contracts relating to the same matters, between the same parties, and made as parts of substantially one transaction, are to be taken together.”
Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp., 863 P.2d 1176 (Okla. 1993). “In considering the Bonners’ claim for rescission on failure of consideration — as opposed to construing the meaning of the Document — the contract construction rule that two contracts between the same parties (a) relating to the same matters and (b) made as parts of…”
Summit Contractors, Inc. v. Legacy Corner, L.L.C., 147 F. App'x 798 (10th Cir. 2005). “1951); see Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 158 (“Several contracts relating to the same matters, between the same parties, and made as parts of substantially one transaction, are to be taken together.”
Sunrizon Homes, Inc. v. Am. Guar. Inv. Corp., 782 P.2d 103 (Okla. 1989). “If such consideration becomes entirely void from any cause.”
High Sierra Energy, L.P. v. Hull, 2010 OK CIV APP 96 (Okla. Civ. App. 2010). “3d 970 , 973 citing 15 O.S. § 158; Sunrizon Homes, Inc. v. American Guar.”
Smoot v. B & J Restoration Servs., Inc., 279 P.3d 805 (Okla. Civ. App. 2012). “" 15 O.S.2011 § 158. We find that the intent of these parties was for Brandon and Julie Hopper to sign the Purchase Agreement in their representative, not individual capacities.”
Inergy Propane, LLC v. Lundy, 2009 OK CIV APP 8 (Okla. Civ. App. 2008). “15 O.S.2001 § 158. However, the Non-Solicitation Agreement and the Non-Compete Agreement concern different matters and were not made as part of the same transaction.”
WLM Retail Trust v. Tramlaw Remainderman Ltd. P'ship, 2018 IL App (1st) 170819 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “" Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 158 (2011). Section 3 of the WalMart lease specifically provides-after stating that the original term ends on January 31, 2009, and WalMart has the option to extend the lease for up to five successive five-year extended terms-that "[a]s used in this…”
Ramick v. Howard-gm II, 414 P.3d 397 (Okla. Civ. App. 2017). “15 O.S.2011, § 158. ¶20 Here, the facts clearly satisfy the statutory criteria of (1) "relating to the same matters"; (2) "between the same parties"; and.”
Hirsch Holdings, L.L.C. v. Hannagan-Tobey, L.L.C., 2008 OK CIV APP 79 (Okla. Civ. App. 2007). “" 15 O.S. § 158; Sunrizon Homes, Inc. v. American Guar.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.