Okla. Stat. » Title 15 — CONTRACTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 598.5 (2026)

Injunctive relief - Damages - Prima facie evidence

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In addition to the penalties provided in the Unfair Sales Act, any person injured by any violation, or who shall suffer injury from any threatened violation of the Unfair Sales Act, may maintain an action in any court of equitable jurisdiction to prevent, restrain or enjoin such violation or threatened violation. If in such action a violation or threatened violation of the Unfair Sales Act shall be established, the court shall enjoin and restrain or otherwise prohibit, such violation or threatened violation and, in addition thereto, shall assess in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant the cost of suit. In such action if damages are alleged and proved, the plaintiff in the action, in addition to such injunctive relief and costs of suit, shall be entitled to recover from the defendant the actual damages sustained by him or her. (b) In the event no injunctive relief is sought or required, any person injured by a violation of the Unfair Sales Act may maintain an action for damages alone in any court of general jurisdiction, and the measure of damages in such action shall be the same as prescribed in subsection (a) of this section. Provided the Unfair Sales Act shall not authorize suits or actions against newspapers, radio broadcasters, or other advertising agencies through which such advertisements are published, broadcast or otherwise made. (c) Evidence of advertisement, offering to sell, or sale of merchandise by any retailer or wholesaler at less than cost to such retailer or wholesaler, shall be prima facie evidence of intent to injure competitors and to destroy or substantially lessen competition. Added by Laws 1949, p. 105, § 5, emerg. eff. May 18, 1949. Amended by Laws 2013, c. 331, § 5, eff. Nov. 1, 2013.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1992–2009 · leading case: Star Fuel Marts, LLC v. Sam's East, Inc., 362 F.3d 639 (10th Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Star Fuel Marts, LLC v. Sam's East, Inc., 362 F.3d 639 (10th Cir. 2004). · cites it 4× “” Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 598.5 (c). Thus, this evidence may be rebutted by proof of lack of injurious intent.”
So-Lo Oil Co. v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 832 P.2d 14 (Okla. 1992). “The pertinent terms of 15 O.S.1981 § 598.5 are: "(a) In addition to the penalties provided in this act, any person injured by any violation, or who shall suffer injury from any threatened violation of this act, may maintain an action in any court of equitable jurisdiction to…”
Station Operation, LLC v. Circle K Stores, Inc., 2010 OK CIV APP 2 (Okla. Civ. App. 2009). “air Sales Act and by the clear language of the Act, the trial court has no discretion to deny Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief, The provision of the Act Plaintiff relies on states: In addition to the penalties provided in this act, any person injured by any violation, or…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 598.5(a) — 1 case
Station Operation, LLC v. Circle K Stores, Inc., 2010 OK CIV APP 2 (Okla. Civ. App. 2009). “air Sales Act and by the clear language of the Act, the trial court has no discretion to deny Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief, The provision of the Act Plaintiff relies on states: In addition to the penalties provided in this act, any person injured by any violation, or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.