Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 274 (2026)

Subsequent security may be demanded - Arrest of witness

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When, however, any material witness on the part of the people has been discharged on his undertaking, without surety, if afterwards, on the sworn application of the district attorney or other person on behalf of the state, made to the magistrate or to any judge, it satisfactorily appears that the presence of such witness or any other person on the part of the people is material or necessary on the trial in court, such magistrate or judge may compel such witness, or any other material witness on the part of the

state, to give an undertaking with sureties, to appear on the said trial and give his testimony therein; and, for that purpose, the said magistrate or judge may issue a warrant against such person, under his hand, with or without seal, directed to a sheriff, marshal or other officer, to arrest such person and bring him before such magistrate or judge. R.L.1910, § 5690.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1995–2011 · leading case: In the Matter of Justin Alexander Marshall Justin Alexander Marshall v. State of Iowa, 805 N.W.2d 145 (Iowa 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In the Matter of Justin Alexander Marshall Justin Alexander Marshall v. State of Iowa, 805 N.W.2d 145 (Iowa 2011). · cites it 2× “, Files 1–27, 30–34, 38, 41) (“to appear and testify before the proper court at a proper time”); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 274 (West, Westlaw through 2011 1st Reg.”

McCarty v. State, 904 P.2d 110 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995). “22 O.S.1981, § 274. . Because this case must be remanded to the district court for resentencing due to error alleged in Proposition XII, no instances of prosecu-torial misconduct alleged to have occurred in the second stage of trial have been discussed.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.