Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 335 (2026)

Evidence for the accused - Procuring additional evidence

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The grand jurors, upon request of the accused, shall, and on their own motion may, hear the evidence for the accused. It is their duty to weigh all the evidence submitted to them and when they have reason to believe that there is other evidence, they may order such evidence to be produced, and for that purpose the State's Attorney shall cause process to issue for the witnesses. R.L.1910, § 5721; Laws 1961, p. 236, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1971–2018 · leading case: Stone v. Hope, 488 P.2d 616 (Okla. Crim. App. 1971).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Stone v. Hope, 488 P.2d 616 (Okla. Crim. App. 1971). “22 O.S.1961, Section 335. In any event, if an indictment is returned it must be subsequently examined at the preliminary examination in view of the rule set forth in Jones v.”

State v. Powers, 952 P.2d 997 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “” ¶ 8 The State submits that Respondent’s Order, substantively identical in each underlying matter, is unauthorized by law because the applicable statute, 22 O.S.1991, § 335, only provides that the grand jury hear evidence “upon request of the accused .”

In re Petition to Summon Grand Jury, 423 P.3d 1044 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). “22-3009 (requiring witnesses receive notice of their right to consult counsel and have counsel present during grand jury questioning); Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 335 (requiring that defendant have an opportunity to testify before the grand jury).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.