Okla. Stat. » Title 22 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 983 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 22-983v1 (SB 689, Laws 2018, c. 128, § 2). OS 22-983v2 (SB 623, Laws 2023, c. 310, § 3). OS 22-983v3 (HB 3546, Laws 2024, c. 211, § 2).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1972–2023 · leading case: Burks v. State, 594 P.2d 771 (Okla. Crim. App. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Burks v. State, 594 P.2d 771 (Okla. Crim. App. 1979). “2d 119 (1972), set forth the procedure for imprisonment resulting from nonpayment of fines; the Court thus implemented 22 O.S.1971, § 983, and also insured equal protection of the law for both indigent and nonindigent.”
Webb v. Maynard, 907 P.2d 1055 (Okla. 1995). “Title 22 O.S.1991, § 983, provides in pertinent part: A.”
State v. Ballard, 868 P.2d 738 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). “Section 101 of title 28, read in connection with the assessment, places the defendant in the same position as any other judgment debtor.”
In Re Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2023 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “22 O.S. § 983(C)(4)] TO ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITHIN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: Upon encountering: Defendant: ________________________ SSN: XXX-XX-_____ Sex: _____ Hair: ____ Address: ________________________ DOB: __/__/_____ Eyes: _____ Weight: ____ ________________________…”
Rutledge v. Turner, 495 P.2d 119 (Okla. Crim. App. 1972). “” The Oklahoma Legislature, addressing itself to the question of imprisonment for non-payment of fine, enacted 22 O.S.1971, § 983, effective June 24, 1971.”
McGee v. City of Oklahoma City, 761 P.2d 863 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “The record before this Court does not reflect whether a specific hearing was conducted regarding appellant’s ability to immediately satisfy the fine and costs in accordance with 22 O.”
Feenstra v. Sigler (N.D. Okla. 2023). · cites it 7× “Additionally, the Oklahoma Legislature passed an amendment to 22 O.S. § 983 and the amendment goes into effect November 1, 2023.”
Wilkins v. Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc. (N.D. Okla. 2021). · cites it 4× “7, § 4; Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 983 (D). These rules are found within Rule 8.”
In Re Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2023 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “§ 983(C)(4)] TO ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITHIN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: Upon encountering: Defendant: ________________________ SSN: XXX-XX-_____ Sex: _____ Hair: ____ Address: ________________________ DOB: __/__/_____ Eyes: _____ Weight: ____ ________________________ Height:…”
Layman v. State, 764 P.2d 1358 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals; 22 O.S.1981, § 983. For the above reasons, the judgment and sentence appealed from is AFFIRMED as MODIFIED to reflect credit for time appellant has reported to probation and REMANDED for a judicial determination as required by 22 O.”
Winchester v. Jones, 455 F. App'x 811 (10th Cir. 2011). “2002) (“In all other cases, 1.e., when the defendant has demanded the jury to assess punishment or the trial judge has allowed the jury to assess punishment, there simply is no provision allowing for mitigating evidence to be presented in the sentencing stage of the trial.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 983(C)(4) — 2 cases
In Re Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2023 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). “22 O.S. § 983(C)(4)] TO ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITHIN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: Upon encountering: Defendant: ________________________ SSN: XXX-XX-_____ Sex: _____ Hair: ____ Address: ________________________ DOB: __/__/_____ Eyes: _____ Weight: ____ ________________________…”
In Re Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2023 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). “§ 983(C)(4)] TO ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITHIN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: Upon encountering: Defendant: ________________________ SSN: XXX-XX-_____ Sex: _____ Hair: ____ Address: ________________________ DOB: __/__/_____ Eyes: _____ Weight: ____ ________________________ Height:…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 983(I) — 2 cases
In Re Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2023 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). “22 O.S. § 983(C)(4)] TO ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITHIN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: Upon encountering: Defendant: ________________________ SSN: XXX-XX-_____ Sex: _____ Hair: ____ Address: ________________________ DOB: __/__/_____ Eyes: _____ Weight: ____ ________________________…”
In Re Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2023 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2023). “§ 983(C)(4)] TO ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITHIN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: Upon encountering: Defendant: ________________________ SSN: XXX-XX-_____ Sex: _____ Hair: ____ Address: ________________________ DOB: __/__/_____ Eyes: _____ Weight: ____ ________________________ Height:…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 983(J) — 1 case
Feenstra v. Sigler (N.D. Okla. 2023). “Additionally, the Oklahoma Legislature passed an amendment to 22 O.S. § 983 and the amendment goes into effect November 1, 2023.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 983(J)(3) — 1 case
Feenstra v. Sigler (N.D. Okla. 2023). “Additionally, the Oklahoma Legislature passed an amendment to 22 O.S. § 983 and the amendment goes into effect November 1, 2023.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 983(a) — 1 case
Feenstra v. Sigler (N.D. Okla. 2023). “Additionally, the Oklahoma Legislature passed an amendment to 22 O.S. § 983 and the amendment goes into effect November 1, 2023.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.