Okla. Stat. » Title 22 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 22-991av1 (SB 1068, Laws 2019, c. 453, § 1) OS 22-991av2 (HB 1460, Laws 2025, c. 305, § 2) OS 22-991av3 (HB 1462, Laws 2025, c. 306, § 1)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 108 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: Leatherwood v. Allbaugh, 861 F.3d 1034 (10th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Leatherwood v. Allbaugh, 861 F.3d 1034 (10th Cir. 2017). · cites it 8× “See Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 991(a)(A)(1).1 1 Okla.”
Honeycutt v. State, 834 P.2d 993 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). · cites it 18× “22 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 991a(A)(1); Haynes v.”
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “¶112 The jury found that Appellant murdered Tia Bloomer while he was "serving a sentence of imprisonment on conviction of a felony.”
State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019). · cites it 2× “2019); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(12) (West Supp.”
Metoyer v. State, 2022 OK CR 27 (Okla. Crim. App. 2022). · cites it 5× “The jury was properly instructed on the range of punishment to include not only a term of imprisonment but also a fine.”
Fite v. State, 873 P.2d 293 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 5× “For example, § 991a provides that after trial, the court may suspend all or part of a defendant's sentence and order a defendant to pay restitution or reimburse a state agency for medical expenses or perform community service.”
Hemphill v. State, 1998 OK CR 7 (Okla. Crim. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “See 22 O.S.Supp.1990, § 991a; 22 O.S.1981, § 991b.”
Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3× “10(A), (B); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 991a(A). The Office of Juvenile Affairs must prepare a rehabilitation plan for the juvenile providing (1) the juvenile facility where the juvenile will be placed (if applicable), (2) the objectives the juvenile is expected to achieve and…”
Taylor v. State, 889 P.2d 319 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “1 ("DNA profile — Use as evidence — Notification of defendant"); 22 O.S.Supp. 1994, § 991a, to be effective July 1, 1996 ("Sentence — Powers of court — County community service sentencing programs — DNA testing for identification purposes"); 74 O.”
Wells v. State, 2016 OK CR 28 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “22 O.S.Supp.2014, § 991a(A)(1). Historically, a term of "probation” as set out in Section 991a(E) acted as a form of post-imprisonment supervision.”
Alexander v. State, 2002 OK CR 23 (Okla. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “While certain sentencing powers of the judge are set forth in 22 O.S.1991, § 991a, including the power to set forth conditions of probation, the statutes historically have not empowered judges to create or act as a judicial triumvirate wherein the judge, *116 by performing three…”
Stewart v. State, 1999 OK CR 9 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “" 22 O.S.Supp.1996, §991a(A)(1). The power of the court to suspend an offender's sentence was limited by the following language: "The provisions of paragraph 1 of subsection A of this section shall not apply to defendants being sentenced upon their third or subsequent to their…”
Show all 108 citing cases →
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(1) — 1 case
Dill v. Page, 496 P.2d 127 (Okla. Crim. App. 1972).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A) — 1 case
Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010). “10(A), (B); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 991a(A). The Office of Juvenile Affairs must prepare a rehabilitation plan for the juvenile providing (1) the juvenile facility where the juvenile will be placed (if applicable), (2) the objectives the juvenile is expected to achieve and…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(1) — 12 cases
Leatherwood v. Allbaugh, 861 F.3d 1034 (10th Cir. 2017). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 991(a)(A)(1).1 1 Okla.”
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “¶112 The jury found that Appellant murdered Tia Bloomer while he was "serving a sentence of imprisonment on conviction of a felony.”
Honeycutt v. State, 834 P.2d 993 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). “22 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 991a(A)(1); Haynes v.”
Wells v. State, 2016 OK CR 28 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). “22 O.S.Supp.2014, § 991a(A)(1). Historically, a term of "probation” as set out in Section 991a(E) acted as a form of post-imprisonment supervision.”
Hemphill v. State, 1998 OK CR 7 (Okla. Crim. App. 1998). “See 22 O.S.Supp.1990, § 991a; 22 O.S.1981, § 991b.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(1)(F) — 2 cases
Wells v. State, 2016 OK CR 28 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). “22 O.S.Supp.2014, § 991a(A)(1). Historically, a term of "probation” as set out in Section 991a(E) acted as a form of post-imprisonment supervision.”
Wells v. State, 2016 OK CR 28 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(1)(a) — 5 cases
Leatherwood v. Allbaugh, 861 F.3d 1034 (10th Cir. 2017). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 991(a)(A)(1).1 1 Okla.”
White v. State, 437 P.3d 1061 (Okla. Crim. App. 2019).
White v. State, 2019 OK CR 2 (Okla. Crim. App. 2019).
Honeycutt v. State, 834 P.2d 993 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). “22 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 991a(A)(1); Haynes v.”
Fite v. State, 873 P.2d 293 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). “For example, § 991a provides that after trial, the court may suspend all or part of a defendant's sentence and order a defendant to pay restitution or reimburse a state agency for medical expenses or perform community service.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(1)(f) — 2 cases
Thomas v. Nunn (N.D. Okla. 2021).
Wells v. State, 2016 OK CR 28 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(1)(hh) — 1 case
Sonnier v. State, 2014 OK CR 13 (Okla. Crim. App. 2014).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(1)(p) — 1 case
In Re Lorice T. Wallace Revocable Trust, 2009 OK 16 (Okla. 2009).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(1)(s) — 3 cases
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “¶112 The jury found that Appellant murdered Tia Bloomer while he was "serving a sentence of imprisonment on conviction of a felony.”
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018).
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Jerry Ellis, Oklahoma State Senator, Dist. 5, 2014 OK AG 11 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2014).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(12) — 1 case
State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019). “2019); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(12) (West Supp.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(13) — 1 case
Donaldson v. City of El Reno, 2025 OK 9 (Okla. 2025).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(14) — 1 case
Donaldson v. City of El Reno, 2025 OK 9 (Okla. 2025).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(3) — 1 case
Honeycutt v. State, 834 P.2d 993 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). “22 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 991a(A)(1); Haynes v.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(l) — 7 cases
Leatherwood v. Allbaugh, 861 F.3d 1034 (10th Cir. 2017). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 991(a)(A)(1).1 1 Okla.”
Honeycutt v. State, 834 P.2d 993 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). “22 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 991a(A)(1); Haynes v.”
Hemphill v. State, 1998 OK CR 7 (Okla. Crim. App. 1998). “See 22 O.S.Supp.1990, § 991a; 22 O.S.1981, § 991b.”
Fleming v. State, 760 P.2d 208 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
Stewart v. State, 1999 OK CR 9 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999). “" 22 O.S.Supp.1996, §991a(A)(1). The power of the court to suspend an offender's sentence was limited by the following language: "The provisions of paragraph 1 of subsection A of this section shall not apply to defendants being sentenced upon their third or subsequent to their…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(l)(a) — 2 cases
Honeycutt v. State, 834 P.2d 993 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). “22 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 991a(A)(1); Haynes v.”
Fite v. State, 873 P.2d 293 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). “For example, § 991a provides that after trial, the court may suspend all or part of a defendant's sentence and order a defendant to pay restitution or reimburse a state agency for medical expenses or perform community service.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(l)(d) — 1 case
Woolen v. Coffman, 676 P.2d 1375 (Okla. Crim. App. 1984).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(A)(l)(f) — 2 cases
Wells v. State, 2016 OK CR 28 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). “22 O.S.Supp.2014, § 991a(A)(1). Historically, a term of "probation” as set out in Section 991a(E) acted as a form of post-imprisonment supervision.”
Nevious v. State, 774 P.2d 1070 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(B) — 7 cases
Honeycutt v. State, 834 P.2d 993 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). “22 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 991a(A)(1); Haynes v.”
Davis v. State, 845 P.2d 194 (Okla. Crim. App. 1993).
Turner v. State, 803 P.2d 1152 (Okla. Crim. App. 1990).
Bumpus v. State, 925 P.2d 1208 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996).
Wofford v. State, 646 P.2d 1300 (Okla. Crim. App. 1982).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(C) — 4 cases
Stewart v. State, 1999 OK CR 9 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999). “" 22 O.S.Supp.1996, §991a(A)(1). The power of the court to suspend an offender's sentence was limited by the following language: "The provisions of paragraph 1 of subsection A of this section shall not apply to defendants being sentenced upon their third or subsequent to their…”
Bumpus v. State, 925 P.2d 1208 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996).
Carldton Willis v. Justin Farris (W.D. Okla. 2026).
Harmon v. Sitzman, 413 F. App'x 28 (10th Cir. 2011).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(E) — 3 cases
Leatherwood v. Allbaugh, 861 F.3d 1034 (10th Cir. 2017). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 991(a)(A)(1).1 1 Okla.”
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “¶112 The jury found that Appellant murdered Tia Bloomer while he was "serving a sentence of imprisonment on conviction of a felony.”
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991a(I) — 2 cases
Duvall v. Ward, 1998 OK CR 16 (Okla. Crim. App. 1998).
Shaffer v. Saffle, 148 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 1998).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.