Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 1423 (2026)

Renumbered as § 1435.3 of this title by Laws 2001, c

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

156, § 35, eff. Nov. 1, 2001.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1989–2003 · leading case: Silver v. Slusher, 770 P.2d 878 (Okla. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Silver v. Slusher, 770 P.2d 878 (Okla. 1989). “The agency status, within the meaning of 36 O.S.1981 § 1423, of the person with whom the insureds dealt — whether as agent of Farmers or of the Silvers — is of no consequence to the outcome of the instant appeal.”

Wynn v. Avemco Ins. Co., 1998 OK 75 (Okla. 1998). “Gentry, 1994 OK 4, ¶ 9 , 867 P. at 471. Even though the renewal of an insurance policy is a new contract, Gov’t Employees Ins.”

Hartz v. Mitchell, 822 P.2d 667 (Nev. 1991). “In addition, the court cited Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 1423 (A) which provides that “[e]very agent.”

Clarendon Am. Ins. v. Cont'l Masonry Corp., 62 F. App'x 909 (10th Cir. 2003). “The district court rejected Continental’s argument, holding that IAM was not Clarendon’s agent as a matter of law under *911 Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 1423 (B) (1990), 1 and therefore, notice to IAM did not constitute notice to Clarendon.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.