Okla. Stat. » Title 52 — OIL AND GAS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 52, § 570.1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 1 through 15 of this act shall be known and may be cited as the "Production Revenue Standards Act". Added by Laws 1992, c. 190, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1992.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Heiman v. Atl. Richfield Co., 891 P.2d 1252 (Okla. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Heiman v. Atl. Richfield Co., 891 P.2d 1252 (Okla. 1995). · cites it 4× “S.Supp. 1983, §§ 541-547. We note that since this controversy arose two statutory schemes have been enacted relevant to proceeds from production, the Production Revenue Standards Act, 52 O.”
Fleet v. Sanguine, Ltd., 854 P.2d 892 (Okla. 1993). · cites it 3× “Damages, interest, court costs, attorneys’ fees or allowable litigation expenses incurred as a result of the violation of [52 O.S.Supp. 1992 §§ 570.1 et seq.]." [Emphasis supplied.”
Arrow Oil & Gas, Inc. v. J. Aron & Co. (In re SemCrude L.P.), 864 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. 2017). “The Oklahoma Production Revenue Standards Act Claims The Oklahoma Producers separately argue that the Oklahoma Production Revenue Standards Act (the “PRSA”), Okla. Stat. tit. 52, §§ 570.1 et seq,, creates an implied trust in their favor that, absent full payment, travels…”
Hitch Enter., Inc. v. Cimarex Energy Co., 859 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (W.D. Okla. 2012). “The Production Revenue Standards Act (“PRSA”), 52 O.S. § 570.1 et seq., as the defendants have argued, not only dictates the disclosures to be made, e.”
Samson Resources Co. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.), 407 B.R. 140 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009). “PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The competing motions for summary judgment presently before the Court raise a question of first impression: whether prior perfected article 9 security interests asserted by the Banks are superior to the rights and interests accorded to Oklahoma Producers…”
J. Aron & Co. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.), 504 B.R. 39 (Bankr. D. Del. 2013). “2 repealed by Okla. Stat. tit. 52, § 549.6 (2010). . See, e.”
Purcell v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc., 1998 OK 45 (Okla. 1998). “10), is now a part of the Production Revenue Standards Act, 52 O.S.Supp. 1992 §§ 570.1 -570.15. That Act provides for a five-year limitations period for actions based upon the Act.”
Tarrant v. Capstone Oil & Gas Co., 2008 OK CIV APP 17 (Okla. Civ. App. 2007). “¶ 8 Capstone admitted it did not timely pay royalties on gas production to Royalty Owners, but asserted it paid back royalties, as well as the 12% interest penalty provided by the Oklahoma Production Revenue Standards Act (PRSA), 52 O.S.2001 § 570.1 et seq., in May and June…”
Nelson v. Linn Midcontinent Expl., L.L.C., 2009 OK CIV APP 99 (Okla. Civ. App. 2009). “Plaintiff accordingly sought an accounting and damages for violation of the Oklahoma Production Revenue Standards Act, 52 O.S. § 570.1, et seq., and conversion.”
ConocoPhillips Co. v. SemGroup, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.), 428 B.R. 82 (Bankr. D. Del. 2010). “Producers from Oklahoma argued that Oklahoma’s Production Revenue Standards Act (“PRSA”), Okla. Stat. tit. 52, § 570.1 et seq., imposes a resulting, implied or constructive trust in favor of the Producers for the oil and gas they sold to the Debtors.”
Foster v. Merit Energy Co., 289 F.R.D. 653 (W.D. Okla. 2012). “4 is part of Oklahoma’s Production Revenue Standards Act, 52 O.S. § 570.1, et seq. As plaintiff has asserted, where the PRSA applies, the royalties attributable to a gas well go into a “pot.”
Base v. Devon Energy Prod., 2024 OK 3 (Okla. 2024). · cites it 4× “The Trustees filed suit against Devon in May of 2019, seeking to quiet title in favor of the 1978 Lease and to obtain pursuant to the Production Revenue Standards Act, 52 O.S.2021, §§ 570.1 et seq , both an accounting and a recovery of the 1 / 16 difference in royalties that…”
Show all 23 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.