Hoag v. Duraflake Co., 585 P.2d 1149 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Hoag v. Duraflake Co., 585 P.2d 1149 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Kephart (orctapp, 1988-04-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Kephart
Or. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Wilson v. Geddes
Or. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978). 2 Hearings are held under ORS 656.307 when responsibility, but not compensability, for a claimant’s disability is at issue.
cited Cited "see" Chapman v. EBI Companies
Or. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
cited Cited "see" King v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Or. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 105, 585 P2d 1149 , rev den, 284 Or 521 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Groshong v. Montgomery Ward Co.
Or. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Godell v. Saif Corp.
Or. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Riddle v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
Or. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Hutchinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Or. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den (1978).
cited Cited "see" Magee v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Or. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Compensation of Banks v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Or. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Kilgore v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Or. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978); Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Company, 33 Or 241 , 576 P2d 27 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Bissonnette v. Roseburg Lumber Co.
Or. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 (1978). ( 602 P2d 683 , rev den 288 Or 527 (1980))
cited Cited "see" Horton v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Co.
Or. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Or. Ct. App. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Day v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Or. Ct. App. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the matter of the Compensation of Jerry HOAG, Claimant, Petitioner,
v.
DURAFLAKE CO., Respondent.
76-3429 CA 9908.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Nov 6, 1978.
585 P.2d 1149
Johnson, P.J., and Gillette and Roberts.
Published

Clayton C. Patrick, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Harold W. Adams, Salem.

Roger R. Warren, Beaverton, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Philip A. Mongrain, Beaverton.

Before JOHNSON, P.J., and GILLETTE and ROBERTS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The issue in this workers' compensation case is the extent of claimant's disability. The question is purely factual. Although we disagree with the Workers' Compensation Board's determination, exposition of the facts would not in any way aid the Board or the bar in analyzing future cases. Accordingly, as we explained in Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Co., 33 Or. App. 241, 576 P.2d 27 (1978), we will not in this or usually in similar future cases publish an extended opinion. Here we note only that, after an evaluation of the record in our role as a "jury," we believe that this claimant is permanently partially disabled to the extent of 288 degrees or 80 percent.

Affirmed as modified.