McIntyre v. Wright, 643 P.2d 338 (Or. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
McIntyre v. Wright, 643 P.2d 338 (Or. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McIntyre, on Review
v.
WRIGHT, and STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION, on Review
CA 19231, SC 28239.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Apr 6, 1982.
643 P.2d 338
Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were K. R. Maloney, General Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, Salem., Stanton F. Long, Deputy Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were David B. Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Campbell, Denecke, Lent, Linde, Peterson, Tanzer.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
TANZER, J.

This is a post-decree garnishment proceeding in a dissolution suit. The trial court allowed a continuing garnishment against defendant’s workers’ compensation benefits in the hands of the insurer. The Court of Appeals modified.

The issues in this case are identical to those presented in the case of Satterfield v. Satterfield, 292 Or 780, 643 P2d 336 (1982) (decided this date). Our decision in this case is based upon the reasons expressed in our opinion in Satterfield.

The Court of Appeals allowance of the garnishment is reversed.