Or. Rev. Stat. § 813.136
Consequence of refusal or failure to submit to field sobriety tests
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
813.136 Consequence of refusal or failure to submit to field sobriety tests. If a person refuses or fails to physically submit to field sobriety tests as required by ORS 813.135 after the person has been informed of the consequences of refusing to submit, evidence of the person’s refusal or failure to physically submit is admissible in any criminal or civil action or proceeding arising out of allegations that the person was driving while under the influence of intoxicants. [1989 c.576 §14; 2019 c.475 §6]
CHEMICAL TESTS; METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case: State v. Fish
State v. Fish (1995)
“135 and ORS 813.136 and that, therefore, evidence of defendant's refusal to perform field sobriety tests should be suppressed.”
State v. Trenary (1992)
“135 provides, in part: "Before [field sobriety] tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136." ORS 813.136 provides: "If a person refuses or fails to…”
State v. Nagel (1994)
“[1] See ORS 813.136 (if a person refuses or fails to submit to field sobriety tests as required by ORS 813.”
Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services (1996)
“135 and ORS 813.136 [4] to the "Implied Consent Law.”
State v. Cabanilla (2012)
“135 provides that a driver is deemed to have consented to submit to field sobriety tests, but “[blefore the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS…”
State v. Mazzola (2015)
“Before the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136.” *821 ORS 813.”
State v. Rohrs (1998)
“Before the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136." ORS 813.136 establishes the consequences of refusing or failing to submit to the tests: "If a…”
State v. Trenary (1993)
“Before the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136.” ORS 813.”
State v. Lawrence (1992)
“ORS 813.136; State v. Fish, <a href="/opinion/1190365/state-v-fish/#612" aria-description="Citation for case: State v.”
State v. Hamilton (2024)
“Before the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136.” 268 State v.”
State v. Scott (1993)
“) The text of ORS 813.136 provides that if a person refuses to submit to a field sobriety test, then evidence of the refusal is admissible in a proceeding arising out of allegations that the person was driving while under the influence of intoxicants.”
State v. Maddux (1996)
“135 and ORS 813.136, that if he refused to submit to the field sobriety tests, that “ ‘evidence of the *38 refusal or failure is admissible in any criminal or civil action or proceeding arising out of the allegation that you were driving under the influence of intoxicants.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.