Or. Rev. Stat. § 813.136

Consequence of refusal or failure to submit to field sobriety tests

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      813.136 Consequence of refusal or failure to submit to field sobriety tests. If a person refuses or fails to physically submit to field sobriety tests as required by ORS 813.135 after the person has been informed of the consequences of refusing to submit, evidence of the person’s refusal or failure to physically submit is admissible in any criminal or civil action or proceeding arising out of allegations that the person was driving while under the influence of intoxicants. [1989 c.576 §14; 2019 c.475 §6]

 

CHEMICAL TESTS; METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case: State v. Fish
State v. Fish (1995) or · cites it 44× “135 and ORS 813.136 and that, therefore, evidence of defendant's refusal to perform field sobriety tests should be suppressed.”
State v. Trenary (1992) orctapp · cites it 16× “135 provides, in part: "Before [field sobriety] tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136." ORS 813.136 provides: "If a person refuses or fails to…”
State v. Nagel (1994) or · cites it 4× “[1] See ORS 813.136 (if a person refuses or fails to submit to field sobriety tests as required by ORS 813.”
Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services (1996) orctapp · cites it 14× “135 and ORS 813.136 [4] to the "Implied Consent Law.”
State v. Cabanilla (2012) or · cites it 6× “135 provides that a driver is deemed to have consented to submit to field sobriety tests, but “[blefore the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS…”
State v. Mazzola (2015) or · cites it 3× “Before the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136.” *821 ORS 813.”
State v. Rohrs (1998) orctapp · cites it 8× “Before the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136." ORS 813.136 establishes the consequences of refusing or failing to submit to the tests: "If a…”
State v. Trenary (1993) or · cites it 3× “Before the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136.” ORS 813.”
State v. Lawrence (1992) orctapp · cites it 5× “ORS 813.136; State v. Fish, <a href="/opinion/1190365/state-v-fish/#612" aria-description="Citation for case: State v.”
State v. Hamilton (2024) orctapp · cites it 2× “Before the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136.” 268 State v.”
State v. Scott (1993) orctapp · cites it 6× “) The text of ORS 813.136 provides that if a person refuses to submit to a field sobriety test, then evidence of the refusal is admissible in a proceeding arising out of allegations that the person was driving while under the influence of intoxicants.”
State v. Maddux (1996) orctapp · cites it 3× “135 and ORS 813.136, that if he refused to submit to the field sobriety tests, that “ ‘evidence of the *38 refusal or failure is admissible in any criminal or civil action or proceeding arising out of the allegation that you were driving under the influence of intoxicants.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.