Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.506 (2026)

Rulemaking; fees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      109.506 Rulemaking; fees. The Department of Human Services by rule shall establish:

      (1) Eligibility standards for Oregon licensed adoption agencies and third party individuals and entities that contract with the department or with an Oregon licensed adoption agency to conduct searches under ORS 109.502;

      (2) Standards of conduct for Oregon licensed adoption agencies and third party individuals and entities that contract with the department or with an Oregon licensed adoption agency to conduct searches under ORS 109.502;

      (3) Contracting procedures for Oregon licensed adoption agencies and third party individuals and entities that contract to conduct searches under ORS 109.502;

      (4) Search procedures to be followed by Oregon licensed adoption agencies and third party individuals and entities that conduct searches under ORS 109.502; and

      (5) Fees to be paid by persons requesting a search under ORS 109.502. Fees authorized under this section include:

      (a) A fee to be paid to the department, an Oregon licensed adoption agency or a third party individual or entity to cover all costs incurred in the search; and

      (b) A fee to be paid to the department, an Oregon licensed adoption agency or a third party individual or entity to cover the administrative costs incurred in administering the search program. [1993 c.410 §7; 1995 c.730 §15; 1999 c.650 §3; 2015 c.200 §14]

 

      Note: See note under 109.425.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1999–1999 · leading case: McCulley v. Bone, 979 P.2d 779 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McCulley v. Bone, 979 P.2d 779 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “ORS 109.506. See generally ORS 109.425 to 109.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.