Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 125.400 (2026)

Order of appointment

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      125.400 Order of appointment. Upon the filing of a petition seeking the appointment of a conservator, the court may appoint a conservator and make other appropriate protective orders if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is a minor or financially incapable, and that the respondent has money or property that requires management or protection. [1995 c.664 §33]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2004–2013 · leading case: Grimmett v. Brooks, 89 P.3d 1238 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Grimmett v. Brooks, 89 P.3d 1238 (Or. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “ORS 125.400 provides, in part: “Upon the filing of a petition seeking the appointment of a conservator, the court may appoint a conservator * * * if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is * * * financially incapable, and that the respondent has…”
Helmig v. Farley, Piazza & Assocs., 180 P.3d 749 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 5× “In this proceeding for the appointment of a conservator under ORS 125.400, appellant Lester Helmig appeals from the probate court’s appointment of respondent Farley, Piazza & Associates as professional conservator for appellant’s mother, Lea Helmig.”
Brown v. MacDonald & Assocs., LLC, 317 P.3d 301 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “1 In 2007, the probate court established the conservatorship after concluding that Brown was financially incapable under ORS 125.400. In 2010, Brown filed a motion to terminate the protective proceeding under ORS 125.”
Cat Champion Corp. v. Primrose, 149 P.3d 1276 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 3× “305; (b) a conservator, ORS 125.400; or (c) a temporary fiduciary, ORS 125.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.