Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 131.105

Timeliness of criminal actions

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      131.105 Timeliness of criminal actions. A criminal action must be commenced within the period of limitation prescribed in ORS 131.125 to 131.155. [1973 c.836 §5]

 

      131.110 [Amended by 1971 c.743 §315a; repealed by 1973 c.836 §358]

 

      131.120 [Repealed by 1973 c.836 §358]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2022 · leading case: Abbott v. Baldwin
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Abbott v. Baldwin (2001) orctapp · cites it 7× “ORS 131.105 to ORS 131.155 generally relate to the subject of time limitations in criminal actions.”
State v. Cookman (1996) or · cites it 2× “125(2)(a) provided that a prosecution must be commenced within three years after the commission of a felony other than murder or manslaughter.”
United States v. Albert E. Mills. United States of America v. Kenneth B. Wonson (1992) cadc “Or.Rev.Stat. § 131.105 (1991). 42 Pa.Cons.”
State v. Berglund (2021) orctapp “In other legal settings, the ability of amended allegations to “relate back” to the time of the initial filing must be expressly authorized and is not implied.”
State v. Newman (2013) or “Under the state’s construction, no criminal code provisions, nor any provisions outside the vehicle code, would apply to vehicle code offenses unless the vehicle code so stated.”
State v. Hinkle (2009) orctapp · cites it 2× “ORS 131.105 provides that a “criminal action must be commenced within the period of limitation prescribed in ORS 131.”
State v. Washington (2014) orctapp “Under ORS 131.105, “[a] criminal action must be commenced within the period of limitation prescribed in ORS 131.”
State v. Anglin (2009) orctapp “We begin with his argument that the criminal action was not commenced within two years, as required by ORS 131.105 and ORS 131.125(6)(b). “A prosecution is commenced when a warrant or other process is issued, provided that the warrant or other process is executed without…”
State v. Purdom (2008) orctapp “See ORS 131.105 (“[a] criminal action must be commenced with the period of limitations prescribed in ORS 131.”
State v. Baty (2011) orctapp “020(7) means what the state says it means — that no vehicle code offense or defense can be “constructed” by application of a statute that lies outside of the vehicle code — then the defendant in a DUII case could not invoke the statute of limitations, ORS 131.105 to 131.125; the…”
State v. Williams (2009) orctapp “See ORS 131.105; ORS 131.145(1). The state alleged in the indictment against defendant that he committed the burglary on or about November 20, 2002, and the theft between November 20, 2002 and January 9, 2003.”
Price v. Oregon State Board of Parole (1985) or “See ORS 131.105 to 131.155. 5 Minutes, House Committee on Judiciary 6 (March 21, 1977 — Statement of Edward J.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.