Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 131A.235 (2026)

Responsive pleading

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      131A.235 Responsive pleading. Except as provided by ORS 131A.240, a person claiming an interest in property that is the subject of a forfeiture action must file a responsive pleading as provided in the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure. If the person has not previously filed a claim under ORS 131A.165, a claim as described in ORS 131A.165 (3) must be attached to the responsive pleading. [2009 c.78 §28]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Yamhill Cnty. v. Real Prop., 373 Or. 82 (Or. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Yamhill Cnty. v. Real Prop., 373 Or. 82 (Or. 2024). “” ORS 131A.235. The procedural mechanisms contemplate that actual notice to interested persons is not always necessary and specify that forfeiture can proceed through a summary ex parte or default procedure, without proof of a conviction, if no claim or responsive pleading is…”
Yamhill Cnty. v. Real Prop., 373 Or. 82 (Or. 2024). “” ORS 131A.235. The procedural mechanisms contemplate that actual notice to interested persons is not always necessary and specify that forfeiture can proceed through a summary ex parte or default procedure, without proof of a conviction, if no claim or responsive pleading is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.